This weekend, Kamala Harris took in some Broadway.
And she or he reminded America that we actually dodged a bullet by not electing her.
She and her husband Doug Emhoff met with the forged of “A Fantastic World: The Louis Armstrong Musical,” and she or he gave a pep speak that was within the fashion made well-known by Damon Wayans’ “In Dwelling Colour” character Oswald Bates — a jailbird who delivers soliloquys that are merely a string of massive phrases that quantity to an entire lotta nonsense.
Within the video, she was stumbling and bumbling via one more phrase salad stuffed with meaningless platitudes.
“After we take into consideration these moments the place we see issues which are being taken, but additionally let’s see it, you already know, nature abhors a vacuum,” she advised the performers.
“The place there’s a emptiness, let’s fill it. Tell us that the fact is that the progress of our nation has been in regards to the enlargement of rights, not the restriction of rights.”
Huh?
As she spoke in Okay turns, her matted hair fell into her face. And with each inane declaration, her eyes bulged like ET and her chin receded into her head. It’s the face one makes after they’ve been learning the whole works of Kendall Jackson.
“We’ve to be clear-eyed. And it doesn’t imply we don’t see the wonder in every part. This stuff all co-exist, however I imagine we struggle for one thing, not in opposition to one thing,” she continued.
And to suppose, in another brat universe, this may be our president.
The timing was poignant as a result of solely days earlier, our Vice President JD Vance was in Munich, delivering an essential, daring and substantive speech in regards to the perils of creeping censorship — and unchecked mass migration.
Vance was performing some a lot wanted heavy lifting, particularly after “60 Minutes” unwittingly underscored his level. Final night time it aired a phase on Germany’s method to combating on-line “hate speech” which included an early morning raid of a person’s condo by six cops. His crime was posting one thing on-line.
It was chilling to see the three prosecutors positively giddy about taking away residents’ telephones like overzealous corridor moniters bent on infantilizing and stifling a complete society.
Although VP, Vance is tackling, head on, the defining problems with our time — the inconvenient truths that threaten Western Civilization and the European democracies.
And whereas I watched him make waves with this historic and hefty speech, my thoughts floated to Harris. She had been on the nationwide stage for near a decade and I nonetheless know little or no about her ideological positions. The one readability she offered had been far left concepts throughout ‘the nice awokening’.
Then her motion to the middle through the election was relayed by her spokespeople and by no means challenged by the media. Except Brett Baier, she was by no means pushed to clarify herself. Even
“60 Minutes” needed to closely edit her interivew to create semi coherent solutions.
The lone ineffective sentiment she will usually talk is that she firmly believes People have hopes and desires. They’ve aspirations.
After which she seems on the present, certain it was in an off-the-cuff context, however what I imagine to be her default setting — it solely affirmed that our nation made the precise choice.
And the distinction between her and Vance — and sure Trump — couldn’t be extra hanging. Her mental choices are much more feeble as compared.
Not solely was Harris not proper for this second in time, she is just not good at this. She was out of her depth in so some ways.
She did, nevertheless, warn she wouldn’t “go quietly into the night time” after dropping in November.
But when the Dems don’t have the nice sense to “unburden” themselves “by what has been” and drop her, they gained’t win anytime quickly. And so they don’t need to both.
Supply hyperlink
