With all of the rhetoric bluster and warmongering coming from Washington and Brussels, it’s clear that peace isn’t their first precedence
“Israel has the suitable to defend itself – in the present day and within the days to return. The European Union stands with Israel,” tweeted European Fee President Ursula von der Leyen, successfully blessing a carte blanche response by the notoriously measured and restrained Israeli management in response to the Hamas assaults.
“Who do you assume you might be? You’re unelected, and haven’t any authority to find out EU overseas coverage, which is about by @EUCouncil,” replied Irish MEP Clare Daly. “Europe does NOT ‘stand with Israel’. We stand for peace. You don’t converse for us. In the event you’ve nothing constructive to say, and also you clearly do not, shut up.”
In a single tweet, von der Leyen managed to place all of Europe as extra militant than even the editorial workers of one in every of Israel’s foremost nationwide newspapers, Haaretz, which positioned blame for the assaults squarely on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, accusing him of “annexation and dispossession” which “overtly ignored the existence and rights of Palestinians.” The implication is that no motion happens in a vacuum absent the danger of sparking a response.
The hazard of Europe’s unelected Queen Ursula unilaterally launching hypersonic advantage signaling missiles in a knee-jerk emotional response is that it will probably’t presumably substitute for overseas coverage determined in additional sobering moments. But today, as a rule, it’s the one sort of overseas coverage we get, on all the pieces from Israel to Ukraine.
In yet one more instance of symbolism getting forward of coverage pragmatism, the EU introduced withdrawal of its help for Palestine … earlier than strolling again the transfer simply hours later. On Monday, Israel’s protection minister introduced that the IDF was going to blockade Gaza much more than traditional by stopping any entry of water, meals, gasoline, and electrical energy. And only a couple hours later, EU Neighborhood and Enlargement Commissioner Oliver Varhelyi mentioned the bloc was becoming a member of the trigger – by withholding its humanitarian funding for the Palestinian folks. Germany and Austria have been the primary to get the ball rolling on funding withdrawal. Nevertheless, just a few hours later, the EU help freeze was reversed by the bloc’s overseas coverage chief, Josep Borrell, after an obvious epiphany that it could solely find yourself “punishing all of the Palestinian folks” and would have “solely additional emboldened terrorists.” There’s no approach Brussels could have been inadvertently funding these terrorists within the first place, is there?
Brussels has given $2.5 billion in direct finances help to the Palestinian Authority over 12 years from 2008, and not too long ago mentioned it could ship some $1.24 billion from 2021 to 2024. The funding wasn’t even diminished or lower off – solely held for just a few months in 2021-2022, then launched with out preconditions – when watchdogs alleged that Palestinian college textbooks had anti-Semitic content material selling and glorifying terrorism. And now Israel’s overseas ministry is pointing the finger at Brussels. “The European Union was financing textbooks of the Palestinian authorities that have been stuffed with antisemitism and incitement for violence and terrorism towards Jews,” Israeli International Affairs Ministry spokesman Lior Haiat mentioned earlier this week.
When the problem was first raised, the EU commissioner in cost on the time met with the Israeli overseas minister in Brussels and principally mentioned, look, we’ll simply ensure that doesn’t occur once more – and handed a decision to that impact. There have been additionally NGO watchdog studies launched earlier this month accusing Brussels of financing grants that ended up within the arms of the Well-liked Entrance for the Liberation of Palestine, which the EU considers to be a terrorist group.
It was simply earlier this 12 months, again in February, that the EU introduced one other over $300 million for the Palestinian folks within the presence of President Mahmoud Abbas – funding for salaries, pensions, well being care, and issues like “climate-smart agri enterprise,” and “inexperienced competitiveness,” And now, immediately, Brussels officers seem like questioning, “Hey wait, did we fund Hamas … possibly?” As a result of that’s what their actions appear to be suggesting. In any other case what’s the issue with persevering with to assist the Palestinian folks?
Or possibly, given all of the climate-conscious verbiage connected to the help, the EU simply received indignant that Hamas’ dangle gliders have been motorized. You simply know that some egghead in Brussels is watching protection of all of the gasoline guzzling pickup vans utilized by Hamas to raid villages and kidnap folks and asking, “What’s the carbon footprint on these?”
All of the advantage signaling on the earth can’t now compensate for a scarcity of due diligence that the schizophrenic withdrawal and subsequent reinstatement of Palestinian funding suggests. It wouldn’t be the primary time that harmless folks suffered due to Brussels’ incompetence. Simply ask the folks of the whole European bloc presently dealing with seemingly countless financial hardship so their leaders can maintain patting themselves on the again for supporting Ukraine.
And similar to in Ukraine, Brussels doesn’t appear too occupied with availing itself of a chance to play any sort of a mitigating or considerate function amid this battle, however is somewhat taking its traditional seat in driving shotgun to the US neocons on regardless of the present factor occurs to be.
Whereas even Secretary of State Antony Blinken says that there’s no “smoking gun” tying Iran to the most recent Hamas assaults, that hasn’t stopped the standard neocon warmongers on the American facet of the Transatlantic alliance from substituting sloganeering for precise coverage, both – in favor of Iranian regime change, after all. “That is one in every of historical past’s finest instances for regime change,” mentioned former US Nationwide Safety Advisor John Bolton. As a result of, on the subject of drumming up Iranian regime change, neocons are immediately keen to take Hamas’ phrase to the financial institution as their reliable supply for Iran’s involvement. “The Biden Administration ought to get a backbone and pin the blame on Tehran the place it belongs,” Bolton later added. It “belongs,” information and coverage be damned, as a result of it suits the unconventional neocon narrative, even when it finally ends up being to the detriment of American lives and pursuits.
“It’s long gone time for the Iranian terrorist state to pay a worth for all of the upheaval and destruction being sown all through the area and world,” chimed in Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC). In some way, these warmongers by no means handle to note the interventionist sponsorship function lengthy performed by Washington and the West that has arguably interfered with all these Center Jap neighbors working issues out amongst one another.
Blustery rhetoric within the warmth of disaster is affordable for the Western armchair generals, however probably costly for numerous others. They shoot off their mouths with little regard to the knock-on results within the pursuits of appeasing allies and supporters. And it’s in these determined moments, when motive dangers taking a backseat to emotion, that they’ve the perfect probability of imposing their probably catastrophic agenda.
The statements, views and opinions expressed on this column are solely these of the creator and don’t essentially symbolize these of RT.
Supply hyperlink
