Second Woman Usha Vance is visiting Greenland this week as a part of a delegation that features the US’s nationwide safety adviser, Mike Waltz.
The go to has brought on alarm in Greenland as President Donald Trump has repeatedly expressed plans to amass Greenland since returning to the White Home and the outgoing Greenlandic prime minister, Múte Egede, labelled the plans aggressive, saying neither one of many pair had been invited for conferences.
Mr Trump curiosity in Greenland isn’t new: he turned embroiled in a spat with Denmark in 2019 after suggesting the US was in shopping for Greenland. On the time, Denmark’s ex-foreign minister, Martin Lidegaard, instructed broadcaster TV2 that it was “a diplomatic farce” and stated Trump’s behaviour was “grotesque” and he was “throwing a hissy match”.
So why does Mr Trump need to make Greenland a part of the US and why is the difficulty resurfacing now?
Upernavik in western Greenland
Denmark has had ties to Greenland for hundreds of years and it was a colony till 1953 when it turned a Danish province. Residence rule was established in 1979 and a 2009 referendum gave extra autonomy to the area.
Greenland will depend on Danish financial help however handles its personal home affairs, whereas Copenhagen takes care of defence and overseas coverage.
Why does Mr Trump need to purchase Greenland?

The US has a refuelling base for long-range bombers and different army infrastructure on Greenland
Greenland lies between the Atlantic and Arctic oceans on a strategically vital route between North America and Europe – and, by extension, Russia. It’s a quarter of the dimensions of the US.
America already has a longtime presence on the island. In 1952 it constructed the Thule Air Drive base as a refuelling cease for long-range bombing missions. The bottom was additionally a ballistic missile early warning and house surveillance website since 1961. Former army airfields in Narsarsuaq, Kulusuk and Kangerlussuaq have change into civilian airports.
Mr Trump has previously cited nationwide safety issues as to why he desires to pursue buy of the nation, saying: “We want higher nationwide safety functions. I have been instructed that for a very long time, lengthy earlier than I even ran [for president]. Individuals actually do not even know that Denmark has any authorized proper to it however, in the event that they do, they need to give it up as a result of we want it for nationwide safety.”
Greenland is wealthy in pure sources, notably coal, zinc, copper and iron ore. Retreating ice may uncover the potential oil and mineral sources, which, if efficiently tapped, may dramatically change the island’s fortunes. Nonetheless, no oil has but been present in Greenlandic waters and the thickness of the ice means exploration is barely attainable in coastal areas.
Getting access to Greenland’s sources would enable the US to counter China’s aggressive financial growth – the nation dominates the worldwide market in rare-earth metals mining. Management of Greenland may additionally hinder Russia’s army ambitions.
Shopping for the territory would additionally go some option to securing Mr Trump’s place in US presidential historical past after Andrew Johnson purchased Alaska from Russia in 1867 and Thomas Jefferson bought Louisiana from the French in 1803.
However Mr Trump isn’t the primary American chief to think about the concept, which has been mooted for the reason that 1860s. In 1946 Harry Truman, as president, proposed to pay Denmark $100 million to purchase Greenland after contemplating the concept of swapping land in Alaska for strategic elements of the Arctic island.
What have Denmark and Greenland stated about it?
In 2019, then Greenland prime minister Kim Kielsen stated: “Greenland isn’t on the market however Greenland is open for commerce and co-operation with different nations, together with the USA.”
On March 11, Jens-Frederik Nielsen of the Demokraatit celebration received 30% of the vote in a normal election and can take the helm within the nation, persevering with the oppositon to Mr Trump’s targets.
“We do not need to be Individuals,” he stated. “No, we do not need to be Danes. We need to be Greenlanders. And we wish our personal independence sooner or later. And we need to construct our personal nation by ourselves, not along with his hope.”
“Greenland isn’t on the market,” Ms Frederiksen stated. “We have to keep calm and stick with our ideas.”
Supply hyperlink