Donald Trump has referred to as for the “termination” of 60 Minutes, a long-established fixture of US journalism, in a contemporary onslaught towards the media that additionally included baseless claims that cash from the nation’s beleaguered international assist physique had been illicitly funding information organisations.
The demand that 60 Minutes be taken off the air got here in a submit on Trump’s Reality Social platform. It was the newest salvo in his long-running dispute with the CBS program over its modifying of an interview with Kamala Harris, final yr’s defeated Democratic presidential candidate, over which Trump has lodged a $10m go well with alleging “election interference”.
“CBS ought to lose its license, and the cheaters at 60 Minutes ought to all be thrown out, and this disreputable ‘NEWS’ present needs to be instantly terminated,” Trump wrote, alleging that this system and the community had “defrauded the general public” to an extent “by no means seen earlier than.”
The diatribe adopted 60 Minutes’ launch of an unedited transcript of Harris’s interview to the Federal Communications Committee in an effort to parry Trump’s accusations. The transcript was additionally posted on its web site.
“[The transcripts] present – per 60 Minutes’ repeated assurances to the general public – that the 60 Minutes broadcast was not doctored or deceitful,” learn an accompanying notice on the location.
The unique controversy arose after the transmitted interview featured a unique phase of Harris’s reply to a query about Israel from the model screened as a trailer. Trump’s supporters claimed that the ultimate model was extra polished than the unique, which was mocked as a “phrase salad”. Trump adopted up by accusing the present of modifying Harris’s reply to painting her in a extra constructive gentle, thus boosting her election possibilities.
Workers of 60 Minutes have denied claims of bias and say such edits are normal observe. Nonetheless, CBS’s proprietor, Paramount World – which is at present searching for an $8bn merger with Skydance Media – has opened negotiations with Trump’s legal professionals over the $10m lawsuit amid studies of strain from the newly appointed FCC chair, Brendan Carr.
In an interview with Fox Information, Carr stated he shared Trump’s opinion concerning the 60 Minutes interview with Harris.
“This can be a uncommon state of affairs the place we have now extrinsic proof that CBS had performed one reply or one set of phrases after which swapped in one other set. And CBS’s conduct by way of this, frankly, has been regarding,” he stated.
Trump – who continuously branded journalists “the enemy of the folks” in his first time period – broadened Thursday’s assault to different retailers by amplifying false claims that USAid, the at present shuttered international help company, had been funding Politico and different information retailers to the tune of $8m.
“With the brand new Democrat scandal that simply arose with respect to USAID illegally paying massive sums of cash to Politico and different media retailers, the query have to be requested, was CBS paid for committing this FRAUD?” he wrote.
The accusation – denied by Politico and subsequently debunked – was first made by Trump-supporting social media influencers , who tried to determine a hyperlink between a glitch that brought about a fee delay to Politico workers and the freezing of USAid’s funding by Elon Musk’s so-called “division of presidency effectivity” (Doge), whose brokers have accessed the federal authorities’s funds system.
It was later repeated by the White Home press secretary, Karoline Leavitt.
The truth is, funds to Politico’s subscriptions companies have been made all through the huge authorities paperwork – together with from workers of Republican members of Congress, the Washington Put up reported. Politico stated in an announcement that simply two separate subscription funds totalling lower than $43,000 got here from subdivisions inside USAid in 2023 and 2024.
In an announcement to workers, Politico’s chief govt officer, Goli Sheikholeslami, and editor-in-chief, John Harris, wrote that the location “has by no means been a beneficiary of presidency applications or subsidies – not one cent, ever, in 18 years”.
Supply hyperlink
