Sean “Diddy” Combs is about to make his first look earlier than the choose who is anticipated to preside over the hip-hop powerbroker’s trial on sex-trafficking prices.
Combs can be delivered to Manhattan federal courtroom from a Brooklyn jail for a Thursday afternoon look earlier than Choose Arun Subramanian.
The listening to is anticipated to lead to deadlines being set for legal professionals on either side to submit arguments that can set up the boundaries for a trial that Combs’s legal professionals wish to begin in April or Could. Prosecutors haven’t expressed a desire for when the trial would possibly happen.
The choose was assigned to the case after one other choose recused himself primarily based on his previous associations with legal professionals within the case.
Combs, 54, has pleaded not responsible to prices lodged towards him final month. These prices included racketeering conspiracy and intercourse trafficking primarily based on allegations that return to 2008.
An indictment alleges Combs coerced and abused girls for years with assist from a community of associates and staff whereas silencing victims by means of blackmail and violent acts together with kidnapping, arson and bodily beatings.
His legal professionals have been making an attempt unsuccessfully to get the founding father of Unhealthy Boy Information freed on bail since his 16 September arrest.
Two judges have concluded that Combs is a hazard to the neighborhood if he’s freed. At a bail listening to three weeks in the past, a choose rejected a $50m bail bundle, together with residence detention and digital monitoring, after concluding that Combs was a risk to tamper with witnesses and impede a unbroken investigation.
In an attraction of the bail rulings to the second US circuit courtroom of appeals, legal professionals for Combs on Tuesday requested a panel of judges to reverse the bail findings, saying the proposed bail bundle “would plainly cease him from posing a hazard to anybody or contacting any witnesses”.
They urged the appeals courtroom to reject the findings of a lower-court choose who they stated had “endorsed the federal government’s exaggerated rhetoric and ordered Mr Combs detained”.
Supply hyperlink
