Lucy Letby was convicted for the homicide and tried homicide of greater than a dozen infants. She has been known as the worst youngster serial killer the UK had seen. However even earlier than the trial was over consultants had begun elevating considerations about her conviction.
Then, final week, got here a bombshell press convention wherein a panel of famend neonatal consultants mentioned they believed not simply that Letby’s conviction was unsafe – however that there was no homicide or deliberate hurt. As an alternative they mentioned the deaths had been attributable to a collection of things together with understaffing and an absence of expertise on the ward to deal with the infants they have been caring for. So what’s the proof that the panel was taking a look at and why achieve this many questions appear to swirl across the Letby trial?
Josh Halliday, the Guardian’s North of England editor, reported on the trial and heard the proof put earlier than the jury. He mentioned: “Till final week, I believe I believed, on the steadiness of possibilities, that Lucy Letby was most likely responsible.” Nevertheless, the press convention raised some severe questions which have made him rethink his opinion.
The investigative reporter Felicity Lawrence has been inspecting the case for 18 months and tells Helen Pidd about what the ramifications of a retrial may very well be. “I believe if it does prove, as seems to be more and more doubtless, to be an enormous, historic miscarriage of justice, there’ll be questions that should be answered by many establishments.”
Supply hyperlink
