LI county informed to pay $60M to unlawful immigrants for detaining them — at federal authorities’s request: officers

0
11
LI county informed to pay M to unlawful immigrants for detaining them — at federal authorities’s request: officers

Suffolk County taxpayers might be on the hook for $60 million in a migrant class-action lawsuit for holding on to unlawful immigrants till the feds might present up and ship them in another country, officers mentioned Wednesday.

A federal choose dominated that the sheriff’s workplace within the Lengthy Island county acted by itself when it held undocumented immigrants for deportation proceedings — as a result of New York State legislation doesn’t enable native cops to take action.

Including insult to damage, the choose says the feds gained’t should chip in to repay the hefty ruling — although they’re those who wished the migrants held within the first place.


Suffolk County Government Ed Romaine says he’s shaking his head at a federal ruling that slams the county for honoring federal immigration holds. Newsday through Getty Photos

“That is a type of issues that makes me shake my head,” Suffolk County Government Ed Romaine mentioned at a press convention Wednesday. “Now we have quite a lot of methods to spend $60 million — nevertheless it’s not paying again unlawful immigrants, a lot of whom are right here on felony prices for violating our legal guidelines.

“Taxpayers are accountable for honoring Immigration and Customs Enforcement — ICE — who requested us to detain prisoners who have been right here unlawfully in the US,” Romaine mentioned.

“We honored the requests of ICE and Homeland Safety to detain these prisoners to allow them to be processed and, I assume, be deported by ICE,” the county government mentioned. “We are actually being sued for detaining them on the request of the federal authorities.”

Filed in 2017 within the identify of two migrants — however representing a category of tons of — the swimsuit sought damages as a result of the plaintiffs have been held by Suffolk County till federal immigration brokers might present up and take them into custody for civil deportation proceedings.

In his 36-page ruling Thursday, US District Decide William Kuntz mentioned the county violated the constitutional rights of the migrants as a result of state legislation didn’t authorize the sheriff to carry them.


Migrant advocates on Long Island.
Immigration advocates sued in Suffolk County and federal immigration authorities in 2017 for holding migrants for deportation. Newsday through Getty Photos

“New York itself has acknowledged that the [federal] cooperation provision … doesn’t apply right here and would in truth be inconsistent with state legislation,” Kuntz wrote. “Whether or not a neighborhood legislation enforcement company assists ICE within the apprehension of aliens pursuant to the [Immigration and Nationality Act] is voluntary.

“The statute itself solely contemplates such help the place it’s ‘in step with state and native legislation,’” the choose wrote. “The place, as right here, the legislation of the state prohibits the conduct that the cooperation subsection contemplates, that subsection can not fairly be interpreted as making use of.”

Kuntz added that the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Workplace “was appearing with out the federal statutory authority.”

In a quick filed on behalf of the migrants within the lawsuit in April, state Lawyer Common Letitia James wrote that detaining an immigrant for deportation “is unauthorized by state legislation.

“Opposite to the competition of the defendants and the US, federal legislation doesn’t independently authorize state or native officers to make the civil immigration arrests at situation right here,” she wrote.

In a press release Wednesday, legal professionals for the immigrants within the class-action swimsuit mentioned the feds also needs to be on the hook for the ruling within the case, and never simply the county.

“The federal defendants have been earlier voluntarily dismissed with out prejudice and that present determination has nothing by any means to do with whether or not their conduct is authorized or not,” LatinoJustice wrote.


Supply hyperlink