A Harvard Medical Faculty professor plagiarized enormous swaths of a report he submitted on carcinogenic chemical substances, based on a federal decide, who agreed to take away it as proof in a category motion case in opposition to Lockheed Martin.
Assistant professor Dipak Panigrahy had despatched in a 500-page report on behalf of the plaintiffs, who’ve accused the weapons producer of releasing poisonous chemical substances from its Orlando, Florida facility, inflicting them to get sick, The Harvard Crimson first reported.
On March 18, US District Courtroom Choose Roy Dalton Jr. granted a movement to toss out Panigrahy’s report as proof and stated the professor, in his report, largely plagiarized from work by the Worldwide Company for Analysis on Most cancers [IARC].
“Dr. Panigrahy’s report is — put plainly — a large number,” Dalton wrote within the movement. “Certainly, the plagiarism is so ubiquitous all through the report that it’s frankly overwhelming to attempt to make heads or tails of simply what’s Dr. Panigrahy’s personal work.”
The Submit has reached out to Dr. Panigrahy and Harvard College for remark.
Panigrahy instructed Fox Information that the court docket made “clear factual errors” and he expects the ruling to be reversed on enchantment.
The professor stated that he had appropriately cited the reviews and articles the decide stated had been plagiarized. The preliminary report included 1107 references, he stated, plus a supplemental report with a further 338 references.
“As I made clear in my reviews and my deposition, I relied on IARC evaluations for his or her complete dialogue of the accessible literature and research outcomes, after which carried out my very own evaluation based mostly on the physique of obtainable proof,” Panigrahy stated.
“The Courtroom ignored this, or didn’t perceive this, and heedlessly accepted the defendants’ mischaracterization of my work. We anticipate the Choose’s order to be overturned,” he added.
Nevertheless, Dalton stated that the plagiarism gave the impression to be “deliberate” and that the professor repeatedly “outright refused” to acknowledge that enormous parts of the report quote different works verbatim and not using a quote or quotation.
“The amount of references truly makes the issues with Dr. Panigrahy’s methodology extra obvious, as he admitted that he didn’t even learn the 1,100 papers of their entirety,” the decide stated.
“In sum, the rampant plagiarism in Dr. Panigrahy’s report leads the Courtroom to conclude that his basic causation methodology as a complete is simply too unreliable to place earlier than a jury,” Dalton continued.
In January, Harvard’s former president Claudine Homosexual resigned in shame after she was accused of plagiarizing others’ works.
Supply hyperlink
