Some Staten Island drivers are placing their petals to the steel — tying bunches of pretend flowers over native velocity cameras to maintain them from working.
Greater than a dozen bunches of the bogus buds have been yanked down from gadgets within the borough in latest weeks, and the town Division of Transportation has recruited the NYPD to assist discover the perpetrators behind the blossoming highway hack.
“Rushing kills. Tampering with velocity cameras is unacceptable and places lives in danger, a DOT rep informed The Submit. “We’re actively working with the NYPD, and the perpetrators will likely be held accountable for jeopardizing public security.”
Some places of the 14 bouquet-covered cameras included Hylan Boulevard in Dongan Hills and Armstrong Avenue in Eltingville, based on varied social-media posts.
It’s unclear when the bouquet protest began, if the identical cameras have been focused a number of instances or what the penalties are for tampering with a velocity digital camera. The DOT didn’t present a listing of places the place blocked velocity cameras have been discovered.
“Delivered to you by The Staten Island Beautification Squad,” learn one tag posted to a floral association affixed to a velocity digital camera, based on a Friday put up on X.
Regardless of the DOT’s disdain for the bud-acious transfer, some Staten Islanders gave the impression to be absolutely behind the flower-wielding vigilantes.
“I assist individuals doing that,” Staten Island contractor John Santos informed The Submit. “It’s a means of retaining cash in our pockets, now we have a tough time sufficient.
“It’s higher than vandalizing it or destroying [the cameras],” mentioned Santos, 34.
“It’s a cash seize,” he mentioned of the gadgets. “It’s the identical factor as congestion pricing.”
A plumber, Mike, referred to as the camera-blocking effort “good.
“Typically you’re a little over [the speed limit]. It doesn’t matter” to the cameras, he mentioned. “I assist [the flower power] with all my coronary heart.”
Enterprise proprietor Joseph O’Toole mentioned, “They need to do away with each velocity cameras.
“It’s all about income,” he mentioned. “The velocity restrict is ridiculously gradual. At [the citywide speed limit of] 25 mph, you might be standing nonetheless.”
Anthony Mattolla, 40, informed The Submit he “hates these cameras” and that “individuals are pissed off.
“We don’t want it over right here. This isn’t Queens Boulevard,” he mentioned, referring to the so-called Boulevard of Loss of life within the different borough. “We don’t have that type of rushing over right here apart from a couple of knuckle heads. They’re often younger. They make it unhealthy for everyone.”
Deli employee James Conrey mentioned he’s “impartial” in regards to the stunt, calling the problem “humorous, however it’s vandalism.”
He in the meantime claimed that it’s not his beloved Staten Islanders rushing however moderately drivers from exterior the borough.
“It ain’t us. Heck, no,” he informed The Submit. “You’ve gotten individuals coming from Brooklyn going to [New] Jersey. I’m positive a few of them are rushing.”
Staten Island Borough President Vito Fossella informed The Submit that “whereas we don’t encourage anybody to step over the road of the legislation, we perceive why so many individuals are fed up.
“Many individuals are justifiably pissed off with velocity cameras,” the borough president mentioned. “What started as a measure to guard kids expanded massively throughout the borough.
“It appears there’s a velocity digital camera each few blocks, and every is energetic 24 hours per day, 12 months per 12 months. Merely put, they’ve develop into money cows and a cash seize.
“Given congestion pricing and rising Port Authority tolls, this latest pattern is no surprise.”
Greater than 4.45 million school-zone speed-camera violations have been issued within the 5 boroughs in 2023, based on the Staten Island Advance, amounting to greater than $222 million in fines citywide.
Staten Island represented the smallest portion of these violations, based on the outlet — however its drivers nonetheless lodged 312,083 amounting to $15,604,150 in fines. That’s in comparison with Queens, which had the best variety of violations at 1,739,345 million and $86,967,250 in fines.
Drivers caught rushing by a digital camera are fined $50 – “far lower than a rushing ticket issued by a police officer,” DOT paperwork level out.
However as an alternative of velocity cameras, Conrey contended that the town ought to be utilizing “police to catch these individuals.
“The digital camera is a hazard,” the 59-year-old deli employee mentioned. “Persons are not paying consideration, they go for the brakes, it may trigger an accident.”
Santos mentioned, “Persons are slamming on their brakes as a result of they’re anxious in regards to the digital camera.
“You see the way in which individuals drive anyway, it doesn’t assist something.”
Supply hyperlink
