Keir Starmer’s authorities is aiming to chop billions of kilos from welfare spending earlier than the spring assertion.
How a lot does the federal government spend on welfare?
Welfare spending has ballooned lately to help Britain’s ageing and more and more unwell inhabitants.
Complete welfare spending was about £296bn in 2023-24, and is forecast by the Workplace for Finances Duty (OBR) to succeed in nearly £378bn by the top of the last decade. The majority of the cash is spent on pensioners – at £142bn in 2023-24.
Nevertheless, spending on health-related advantages for working-age adults has risen sharply lately, and for the reason that Covid pandemic particularly. The invoice for 16- to 64-year-old incapacity advantages – typically often called illness advantages – that are means-tested, and for incapacity advantages, which aren’t, was about £48bn in 2023-24, and is forecast to hit nearly £76bn by 2030.
What’s behind the rising welfare invoice?
There are two most important drivers contributing to 90% of the rise in welfare spending between now and 2030.
First, an ageing inhabitants and the federal government’s triple lock – which ensures an increase within the worth of the fundamental and new state pension yearly by the very best of earnings development, inflation, or 2.5%.
Second, rising caseloads for well being and incapacity advantages.
A number of components lie behind the rise in health-related profit claims, however specialists agree Britain has usually develop into an more and more unwell nation in latest a long time – with a pointy rise in psychological well being issues particularly.
As many as 8.2 million working-age folks have work-limiting well being circumstances – not simply amongst profit claimants – and annually greater than 300,000 folks depart their jobs and find yourself leaving the workforce solely, in line with the Well being Basis.
Ranges of weight problems and diabetes have risen sharply, whereas the proportion of working-age households with not less than one disabled grownup has risen over the previous decade, in line with the Decision Basis. Over an analogous time interval, reported psychological well being issues have additionally jumped from 8% to 10% of working-age folks to between 13% and 15%, in line with the Institute for Fiscal Research.
The speedy development in health-related profit claims has not been matched in different wealthy economies. That might imply the UK had a selected massive well being shock – maybe linked to document NHS ready lists and crumbling public providers.
The UK additionally has comparably low ranges of fundamental unemployment help and extra demanding job-search necessities. Amid the price of dwelling disaster, that might incentivise claimants to hunt health-related entitlements.
Whereas spending on health-related advantages for non-pensioners has elevated from 1.2% of GDP in 2005-06 to 2.2% in 2025-26, this has largely been offset by falling spending on different advantages for this age group – from 3.5% to 2.8% over the identical time interval.
General, the extent of spending on advantages for this group has remained roughly regular at about 5%.
Why does Labour need to reform welfare?
Labour’s goal is to get extra folks into work and to economize on the advantages invoice.
There are three driving forces: the general public funds, the financial system, and politics.
Reeves is pushing to seek out £6bn financial savings from welfare earlier than the 26 March spring assertion to make sure her fiscal guidelines are met. Nevertheless, Liz Kendall, the work and pensions secretary, is pushing to recycle among the financial savings into job help.
Britain is likely one of the few international locations within the developed world with an employment charge decrease than earlier than the pandemic, after a pointy rise within the variety of adults leaving the labour pressure due to long-term illness.
Official figures present financial inactivity – when working-age adults are neither in a job or on the lookout for work – has ballooned to about 2.8m, near a document excessive. Getting extra folks able to work would assist employers to recruit, supporting Labour’s ambitions to develop the financial system.
Final yr, the Institute for Employment Research estimated the financial system would have been £25bn a yr bigger and the general public funds £16bn a yr higher off if Britain had maintained its pre-Covid employment ranges. Fixing the nation’s well being may save the NHS £18bn a yr by the mid-2030s, in line with the IPPR thinktank.
Getting extra folks into work would additionally assist get monetary savings on the advantages invoice, in a virtuous circle for the financial system and public funds. The massive debate is how the federal government drives this variation.
For Starmer there may be additionally a political dimension. The prime minister argues a “deep British worth” is that if any person may work, they need to – drifting on to sometimes centre-right political floor, and leaning into opinion polls displaying that voters suppose advantages eligibility will not be strict sufficient.
What modifications might be made?
Labour has already vowed to chop £3bn over the subsequent three years and is anticipated to announce billions extra in financial savings from the non-public independence cost (Pip), the principle incapacity profit.
One possibility might be to freeze the uprating Pip awards with inflation – an method even George Osborne prevented whereas freezing many different advantages for 4 years. The centre-right thinktank Coverage Alternate, in a report backed by former Labour work and pensions secretary David Blunkett, has additionally recommended making Pip conditional for 16- to 30-year-olds.
Reforms to common credit score eligibility may be pursued, in line with particulars first reported by ITV. This might embody elevating the fundamental charge for these looking for work, whereas reducing the speed for these judged unfit for work.
Labour is, nevertheless, dealing with a backlash from charities, campaigners and MPs on its again benches, as profit cuts would hit the poorest and most susceptible in society hardest.
The Joseph Rowntree Basis says 900,000 kids stay in a family the place somebody receives illness advantages although common credit score (UC).
Its analysis confirmed nearly half of adults in a family the place somebody claims health-related UC are additionally in a family with out dependable entry to sufficient reasonably priced, nutritious, wholesome meals, in contrast with 11% of all working-age adults.
Some specialists additionally warn that reducing advantages would have a restricted impact on driving up employment. Earlier this week, the Fee for More healthy Working Lives concluded that further job and well being help would save greater than it will value, with financial savings of as much as £1.1bn over 5 years.
Supply hyperlink