Warhol idolised her, Thatcher copied her and Kingsley Amis had a deep concern of farting in her presence: however what was the Queen actually like?

0
7
Warhol idolised her, Thatcher copied her and Kingsley Amis had a deep concern of farting in her presence: however what was the Queen actually like?

When individuals appeared on the Queen, what did they see?
On one stage, the reply is apparent: they noticed a residing illustration of the face they’d absorbed, typically with out noticing, nearly each day of their lives: on tv, on cash and postcards, in newspapers and books and magazines, on-line, on partitions, in galleries and on stamps.

These introduced to the Queen discovered the expertise discombobulating. Although it might have been the primary time they’d ever set eyes on her, they have been typically extra accustomed to her face than with their very own. Hers was essentially the most photographed face in human historical past.

So to fulfill the Queen was apt to make you’re feeling giddy or woozy, as if a well-loved household portrait, acquainted since childhood, handed down from technology to technology, had immediately sprung to life. For many, the expertise was unnerving, even terrifying.

‘She was what we product of her’ … Queen Elizabeth. {Photograph}: Bettmann/Bettmann Archive

She was what we product of her. A pal of mine, {a magazine} editor, was requested to one of many Queen’s common “casual” lunches for distinguished individuals from totally different walks of life. As he was ushered in, a senior courtier prompt that he would possibly care to spend a penny. When he mentioned he didn’t assume it obligatory, the courtier suggested him it was greatest to be on the protected aspect: one or two earlier company had “had an accident” upon being introduced.

The comedian novelist Kingsley Amis was invited to at least one such lunch in 1975. “He had been terrified for days concerning the unpremeditated fart or belch and was on a strict non-bean-and-onion weight-reduction plan,” certainly one of his oldest pals, Robert Conquest, gossiped sneakily to a different, Philip Larkin. His concern reignited itself 15 years later. Earlier than going to Buckingham Palace to obtain a knighthood, Amis grew so afraid of defecating in entrance of the Queen that, within the phrases of his son Martin, he “had his physician lay down a firewall of Imodium, and there was some doubt, afterwards, whether or not he would ever once more go to the bathroom”.

Maybe she was much less a portray, extra a mirror. Together with her inside world screened from public view, and her dialog restricted by protocol to questions not solutions, she turned a human looking-glass: the sunshine forged by fame bounced off her, and again on to these she confronted. To the optimist, she appeared an optimist; to the pessimist, a pessimist. To the insider, she appeared intimate, to the outsider, distant; to the cynic, prosaic, and to the awestruck, charismatic. Having sat subsequent to her at a banquet in Buckingham Palace in 1956, the Soviet common secretary Nikita Khrushchev got here away with the impression that she was “the kind of younger girl you’d be more likely to meet strolling alongside Gorky Avenue on a balmy summer time afternoon”.

When individuals spoke of her, they spoke of themselves, and once they dreamed of her, they dreamed of themselves. She mirrored their hopes and anxieties. “Princess Elizabeth and Philip are again on the town, and throughout the road tonight,” wrote the troubled younger suspense author Patricia Highsmith, staying in Rome on the night time of 19 April 1951. “Site visitors bottlenecked & everybody indignant & bewildered.”

I met her as soon as, nearly by probability. I used to be 20 years previous, and a pal invited me to his dad and mom’ twenty fifth marriage ceremony anniversary. His dad and mom have been titled and unusually rich: their Kensington home got here with a faux bookshelf within the sitting room, which led right into a ballroom.

This ballroom was the place the get together was being held. I entered it early with my bunch of pals. I think about we made an effort to smarten up, however we have been, for essentially the most half, a scruffy lot.

I will need to have been conscious that the Queen was there, however I had no considered assembly her. I felt she was for the true company, the grownups. So it got here as a shock when, crossing from one aspect of the crowded room to the opposite, I ran into my pal’s father, a really courteous man. “Ah, Craig,” he mentioned. “Would you prefer to be introduced?”

So there I used to be, a second later, shaking arms with the Queen. “Craig has been writing some amusing articles for Punch journal,” mentioned my host.

“Actually? That should be enjoyable,” she replied. I took this as a transparent signal that she wished to know all about Punch and Non-public Eye and the distinction between the 2 magazines. I used to be unstoppable. Like most individuals she encountered, I discovered myself speaking gibberish. I instructed her all about English humour, and Wodehouse and Monty Python and Simply William and Marty Feldman, not forgetting Edward Lear and Lewis Carroll. “How attention-grabbing,” she would chip in, once in a while, or generally, “Most amusing”.

Queen Elizabeth with Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher in 1984. {Photograph}: Dominique Faget/AFP/Getty Photographs

As I stored speaking, I observed that, once in a while, she would take a step again. So I might take a step ahead, and she or he would take a step again, and so forth. We’d have continued like this for ever – Ginger Rogers and Fred Astaire – had my pal’s father not intervened on her behalf, taking her off to talk to another person, and leaving me to make my method throughout the room, and again to actuality.

Andy Warhol and the Queen have been close to contemporaries: the Queen was born in Mayfair, London, on 21 April 1926 and Andy Warhol was born in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on 6 August 1928.

I spent a number of days shadowing Warhol on his go to to Britain in 1979, and observed they’d different issues in frequent, too. They’d each met an inordinate variety of individuals (one out of alternative, the opposite out of responsibility); each employed an identical stonewall defence in interactions, by some means showing to take part in dialog with out surrendering something of themselves; each employed generalised enthusiasm in a truncated kind. For the Queen, “How attention-grabbing” or “Actually?” was normally adequate to maintain a dialog ticking alongside; Warhol was additionally keen on “attention-grabbing”, however extra typically employed its transatlantic equal: “Gee” or “Gee, that’s nice”.

For assembly strangers, these non-committal, reflex exclamations have been normally greater than sufficient. The job of Twentieth-century celebrities was to reflect the expectations of these they encountered.

Warhol and the Queen each most well-liked to maintain their emotions and opinions to themselves. “She inclines to say much less reasonably than extra,” Prince Philip as soon as noticed of his spouse. Her critics would harp on about her blankness. Polly Toynbee as soon as described her as “the previous mistress of nothingness”. Comparable observations have been typically levelled at Warhol, too, although within the bleak world of latest artwork “nothingness” was typically taken for reward.

The Queen took her fame as a given. It was a part of her, one thing she needed to dwell with, like a birthmark. However Warhol, unknown till his early 30s, by no means stopped hankering for extra. “I wish to be as well-known because the Queen of England,” he as soon as mentioned.

On one go to to England, Warhol visited Vivienne Westwood and Malcolm McLaren’s punk retailer on the King’s Highway, which had lately been renamed Seditionaries. Within the aftermath of punk, it had remodeled from a revolutionary Situationist outpost into a dear vacationer vacation spot for punk memorabilia, although Warhol failed to note the distinction. Among the many retro souvenirs have been T-shirts bearing the Queen’s head, rendered punk by the addition of the cut-out newspaper headlines “GOD Save THE QUEEN” and “SEX PISTOLS” over her eyes and mouth.

Three years on, Warhol’s vendor wrote to the Queen asking for permission to make use of her portrait in a collection of screenprints. Ten days later, he acquired this letter again:

Pricey Mr Mulder,
I’m commanded by The Queen to acknowledge your letter of sixth September about Mr. Warhol’s plans to color portraits of Their Majesties The Queens of Nice Britain, Denmark and The Netherlands. Whereas The Queen would definitely not want
to place any obstacles in Mr. Warhol’s method, she wouldn’t dream of providing any touch upon this concept.

Yours sincerely, W. Heseltine

By 1985, Warhol’s screenprints – brightly colored variations of Grugeon’s authentic 1975 portraits – have been prepared. Warhol rode in Prince Rupert Loewenstein’s Bentley to the opening of his Reigning Queens exhibition on West Broadway and Inexperienced Avenue. He left early, stuffed with self-loathing. “I’ve hit all-time low,” he confessed to his diary.

However, Warhol’s private curiosity in royalty remained fixed. Few, if any, British artists shared his eager, nearly feverish, fascination with even essentially the most humdrum Royal goings-on. On a visit to London on 9 July 1986, he famous, “That is the week in between Wimbledon and Fergie’s marriage, so it was thrilling.” And two weeks later: “I’ve been watching these items on Fergie and I’m wondering why doesn’t the Queen Mom get married once more.”

He had as soon as taken a elaborate to the Queen’s second son, however with time his curiosity light. “Prince Andrew has gotten so ugly, he’s wanting like his mom,” he famous in his diary on 11 February 1987. This was to be certainly one of his final entries: 11 days later, he underwent a routine operation on his gallbladder, and died.

However 1 / 4 of a century after his demise, Andy Warhol secured himself a everlasting residence in Buckingham Palace. For an undisclosed sum, the Royal Assortment bought the portrait of the Queen from the Reigning Queens portfolio in its costly “Royal” version, sprinkled with diamond mud, lending it a glittery impact.

“Warhol has simplified Grugeon’s portrait so that each one that is still is a mask-like face,” runs the official Royal Assortment catalogue entry. “All character has been eliminated and we’re confronted by a logo of royal energy.”

One other up to date of the Queen, simply six months her senior, was Margaret Thatcher. The 23-year-old Margaret Roberts first set eyes on her future monarch at Newmarket races in 1949. She instantly succumbed to a standard delusion. “SAW PRINCESS ELIZABETH, AND SHE SAW ME!” she wrote in excited capitals in a boyfriend’s diary.

13 years later, by now a married girl and the Conservative MP for Finchley, Margaret Thatcher was happy to be invited to a reception at Buckingham Palace. “The Queen has a a lot stronger character than most individuals realise and she or he is definitely not overshadowed by the Duke of Edinburgh,” she instructed her father in a letter residence. As she gazed on the Queen that day, was she, like so many others, unconsciously pondering of herself?

As soon as she turned prime minister, Mrs Thatcher would go to the Queen each Tuesday for her weekly viewers in Buckingham Palace. These audiences have been, says Mrs Thatcher’s authorised biographer Charles Moore, “hardly ever productive, as a result of Mrs Thatcher was nervous. The Queen famous the way in which through which her prime minister might by no means loosen up in her presence. ‘Why does she all the time sit on the sting of her seat?’ she requested.”

skip previous e-newsletter promotion

The connection between the 2 most well-known and highly effective girls within the nation was, within the phrases of the Queen’s non-public secretary, William Heseltine, “completely right and maybe not very cosy”. Heseltine felt this might need been no less than partly the fault of the Queen, “for not coming in when Mrs Thatcher drew breath and turning the speak into extra of a dialogue”. For her half, the Queen appears to have been intrigued by what went on in her prime minister’s head.

“Do you assume Mrs Thatcher will ever change?” she as soon as requested Lord Carrington, Thatcher’s first overseas secretary.

“Oh no, Ma’am,” replied Carrington. “She wouldn’t be Mrs Thatcher if she did.”

How the 2 girls interacted turned a subject of hypothesis.

Susannah Constantine, who had for a while been the girlfriend of Princess Margaret’s son, Viscount Linley, as soon as witnessed a tussle over a teapot between the Queen and Mrs Thatcher.

In 1984, on the age of twenty-two, she went to remain at Balmoral. The Thatchers have been fellow company. “Whereas Denis was really very relaxed, Thatcher was awkward,” she recalled. Within the afternoon, six or seven gathered by the aspect of the river for tea and sandwiches in a hut “the dimensions of a suburban entrance room … certainly one of them was the prime minister and one other the Queen”.

A big teapot, referred to as Brown Betty, was prepared on the desk, “just like the Queen herself, unfrivolous, sturdy and sensible. Match for goal.”

As was her normal observe, the Queen lifted the teapot as Susannah Constantine held out her china cup. “As if by magic, a redundant Thatcher appeared at her aspect like a spectre. ‘Let me try this, Your Majesty.’”

With out additional ado, Mrs Thatcher put her hand beneath the teapot to take its weight, however “her supply was met with surprising resistance from the Queen”. Not realizing what to do, Constantine lowered her cup slightly, whereupon Mrs Thatcher “tightened her fingertips across the base and tried as soon as once more to take the pot from its proprietor, however no … Evidently the Queen had no intention of relinquishing the fats, brown pot. An additional, extra decided pull from Thatcher was met with an equally resolute maintain from Her Majesty.”

Constantine put her cup and saucer again down on the desk. “I didn’t think about the Queen was really going to kill Thatcher … nevertheless it was fairly tense. Then abruptly, with out warning, the pot was free: launched again to its rightful proprietor. Thatcher had thrown within the towel.”

Few who witnessed them collectively might resist gossiping about their peculiar dynamic; any indicators of friction have been beadily chronicled. For example, on 10 September 1985, Kenneth Rose wrote in his diary that the Queen had complained to Girl Trumpington, “She stays too lengthy and talks an excessive amount of. She has lived too lengthy amongst males.”

Gossip like this continued for a few years after Mrs Thatcher’s fall from energy. On 1 June 1997, Rose was Isaiah Berlin’s visitor at “a luxurious tea”. Afterwards, Rose wrote in his diary that Berlin had instructed him that Mrs Thatcher and the Queen had been at daggers drawn over the Commonwealth:

“Each the Queen and Thatcher got here to a gala at Covent Backyard, however sat in several components of the home. Within the interval the Queen let it’s recognized that she didn’t wish to meet Mrs Thatcher – who was despatched to an higher room for drinks, as was Isaiah. Thatcher then mentioned she want to say goodbye to the Queen, a request that was ignored.”

However even after a decade or extra as prime minister, Margaret Thatcher’s sense of old style awe within the presence of her monarch by no means left her. On Christmas Day, she would nonetheless be sure that lunch was completed in time to observe the Queen’s speech on tv. “She revered each the structure and the monarch,” recalled her devoted bushy-browed press secretary Sir Bernard Ingham. “That was manifested in the way in which she curtsied. I’ve by no means seen anybody go so low and I questioned if she’d ever stand up. It was once a little bit of a joke – how low will she go this time?”

As her years in Downing Avenue rolled on, some observers started to note that Mrs Thatcher was starting, in an odd, shape-shifting method, to morph into the monarch. Little by little, she took on lots of the Queen’s most acquainted props: her thick-heeled patent-leather footwear, her purse and, on formal events, her regal cloaks and robes. She even began adopting the royal “we”, using it in more and more weird methods. “We’re a grandmother,” she instructed reporters after the delivery of her son Mark’s child boy.

For her half, the Queen was recognized to search out the Thatchers slightly comical of their efforts to please. The Duke of Devonshire instructed James Lees-Milne that the Queen was “fairly indiscreet” concerning the Thatchers. “She mentioned to one of many equerries on the Palace whereas awaiting them, ‘Don’t make me snigger when Denis bows from the waist.’”

After the 1982 Falklands battle, some felt Mrs Thatcher had usurped the position of the Queen by taking the salute on the victory parade; her go to to the Falklands the next January resembled a royal progress. “The fixed references to ‘her’ troops proclaim that it is a royal go to,” wrote a commentator within the Occasions. After nationwide disasters, she would lose no time in visiting the victims. “Within the occasion of demise or critical harm” learn a joke badge, common amongst her opponents, “I don’t want to be visited by Margaret Thatcher”.

In 1985, two psychiatrists, Dr Ian Deary and Dr Simon Wessely, reported on a brand new phenomenon within the British Medical Journal. 4 of their sufferers affected by superior dementia – unable to recollect their very own names, or what yr it was – have been however capable of identify Mrs Thatcher because the prime minister. A research of information from 1963 and 1968 revealed one additional oddity. In these years, Queen Elizabeth II had been recognized with a lot larger frequency than both of the 2 prime ministers. However by 1983 “Mrs Thatcher … was clearly extra outstanding in our sufferers’ minds than the monarch.”

“We’ve change into a nation with two monarchs,” noticed the political commentator (and later novelist) Robert Harris in 1988. “ … On her housewife/celebrity progress all over the world, Margaret Thatcher has steadily change into extra just like the Queen of England than the true factor.”

Some sensed a aggressive edge in relations between the 2 girls. Throughout certainly one of her annual diplomatic receptions on the Palace, the Queen observed that her prime minister, feeling slightly faint, had determined to sit. “Oh, look, she’s keeled over once more,” she noticed, coolly.

But when there was friction between them, it vanished with Mrs Thatcher’s departure from workplace. After giving the Queen discover of her resignation, “She was deeply upset,” recalled Lord Fellowes; “ … when she emerged, she was in a really distressed state and unable to talk.” Again in Downing Avenue, “she went straight upstairs to the flat and ran to the lavatory and she or he completely wept,” recalled her private assistant. “She mentioned: ‘It’s when persons are form to you that you just really feel it most. The Queen has been so form to me.’”

In 2005, an eightieth party was thrown for Margaret Thatcher on the Mandarin Oriental Resort in Knightsbridge. By now, a collection of strokes had rendered her thoughts hazy. As she noticed the Queen approaching, she requested, “Is all of it proper if I contact her?” She held out her hand as she curtsied, and the Queen took it and steadied her.

“That was uncommon for the British, who know you aren’t supposed to the touch the Queen,” noticed her former non-public secretary for overseas affairs, Charles Powell. “However they have been hand in hand, and the Queen led her across the room.”

That is an edited extract from A Voyage Across the Queen by Craig Brown, printed on 29 August by HarperCollins (£25). To help the Guardian and Observer, order your copy from guardianbookshop.com. Supply prices could apply


Supply hyperlink