Twilight of the A-list: has the twenty first century killed off the film star?


These are darkish days for film stars. The brand new Brad Pitt action-comedy Bullet Prepare took $30.1m (£24.6m) on its opening weekend within the US – a strong sufficient determine to high the home field workplace chart, however unspectacular given the movie’s $90m finances and Pitt’s star energy. One of many few actors who can nonetheless “open” a movie, Pitt represents an more and more endangered breed: the film star who refuses to do TV.

One other TV holdout, Tom Cruise, continued his sizzling streak with Prime Gun: Maverick, which just lately surpassed Titanic on the US field workplace, though the movie’s very success is being heralded as the tip of an period, with Cruise lionised variously as “the final film star” and “the final film star standing in a altering Hollywood”. In the meantime, obituaries declare the “demise of the film star” and “RIP to the film star”.

If the film star isn’t precisely useless, they’re actually having fun with the hammiest of demise scenes, like Marlon Brando’s virtuoso farewell in The Younger Lions: stumbling after being shot and rolling headlong down a hill, earlier than being stopped by a department, wanting shocked and blinking incredulously, then toppling right into a watery ditch.

Brad Pitt in Bullet Prepare. He is likely one of the few stars to have resisted TV in recent times. {Photograph}: Sony/Scott Garfield/Allstar

The A-list is a shrinking paddock of ageing thoroughbreds. All 5 movies within the high 100 this yr that is likely to be known as “star automobiles” – Cruise in Prime Gun: Maverick, Pitt in Bullet Prepare‚ Sandra Bullock in The Misplaced Metropolis, Mark Wahlberg in Father Stu and Jennifer Lopez in Marry Me – characteristic leads who discovered fame within the 90s, with a mean age of 56. The 2010s appear to have produced fewer certifiable film stars than any earlier decade. Chris Pratt, Benedict Cumberbatch, Adam Driver and Jennifer Lawrence have had substantial careers out of superhero spandex, with Lawrence rushing by her ingenue section to win an Oscar at 22 and now having fun with the twilit semi-retirement from the grind that an Academy Award buys you. Even so, after a trio of failures from 2016 to 2018 – Pink Sparrow, Mom! and Passengers – the Hollywood Reporter revealed a bit titled: “If Jennifer Lawrence Can’t Open a Film, Who Can?”

“There are not any film stars any extra,” stated the Avengers actor Anthony Mackie in a clip that did the rounds on Twitter. “Anthony Mackie isn’t a film star; The Falcon is a film star. And that’s what’s bizarre. It was, with Tom Cruise and Will Smith and Stallone and Schwarzenegger, whenever you went to the films, you went to go see the Stallone film; you went to go see the Schwarzenegger film. Now you go see X-Males. So, the evolution of the superhero has meant the demise of the film star.” Chris Evans has loved taking part in towards kind in Knives Out and The Grey Man, however virtually each Avengers solid member who got here to fame by the sequence has struggled to make it exterior the Marvel bubble.

In fact, studies of the demise of the film star are to be taken with a pinch of salt. A part of it’s the pure means of “ageing out” that happens periodically in Hollywood, as one era palms over to a different. “Glamour is on life assist and isn’t anticipated to dwell,” declared Joan Collins at finish of the 60s, because the star system – by which studios signed actors to unique seven-year contracts, giving them classes in manners, diction, appearing, driving, strolling, dancing, singing and fencing – lastly crumbled. It made method for the younger turks who adopted – Jack Nicholson, Robert Redford, Steve McQueen, Dustin Hoffman, Robert De Niro, Al Pacino – who in flip paved the route for the celebrities of the 80s and 90s.

However who can deny {that a} delicate sapping of movie-star energy is at work when the producers of the 2022 Oscars invited sports activities stars together with Tony Hawk, Shaun White, Kelly Slater and the Williams sisters on to the rostrum to presents awards, banishing Samuel L Jackson, Elaine Might, Liv Ullmann and Danny Glover to the untelevised Governors awards to choose up honorary Oscars?

All through many of the 90s, the large query hanging over George Clooney’s profession was whether or not he may get away from TV and make it within the motion pictures. In the present day, Keanu Reeves has simply signed up for a TV present (executive-produced by Leonardo DiCaprio), becoming a member of Harrison Ford, Dakota Fanning, Jude Legislation, Emma Stone, Amy Adams, Meryl Streep, Jonah Hill, Julia Roberts, Sean Penn and Matthew McConaughey in finishing the reverse exodus, from the ever-more convulsive film enterprise to the relative sanctuary of TV. Clooney topped the checklist of highest-paid film stars in 2017 – not for any position, however for promoting the tequila model he co-founded for $1bn.

“The enterprise has modified totally,” Roberts advised the New York Occasions in April, upon the discharge of the mini-series Gaslit (which additionally stars Penn). “Once I began, I felt such as you did a film and if it did properly then you definitely would possibly get provided a few different motion pictures and might need extra selection and also you’d receives a commission a bit of bit extra on the following one. There have been incremental shifts in alternative and it made extra sense. Now, it’s made extra of air; perhaps it doesn’t really feel as sturdy whenever you’re going alongside. I felt fairly sure-footed in regards to the decisions I used to be making. You don’t have these incremental markers any extra, it doesn’t seem to be.”

Jennifer Lawrence opposite Bradley Cooper in 2012’s Silver Linings Playbook
Jennifer Lawrence, who gained an Oscar for her efficiency reverse Bradley Cooper in 2012’s Silver Linings Playbook, was one in all solely a handful of actors to skirt with movie-star standing within the 2010s. {Photograph}: Snap Stills/Rex Options

The causes of this volatility are multifarious and far-reaching. Nowadays, studios rely virtually completely on superhero motion pictures and different branded franchises – for which they’ll simply as simply solid newcomers as stars – to attract crowds into cinemas. Amazon paid $465m for its manufacturing of The Lord of the Rings, a spin-off with no stars connected, whereas subscriptions to streaming providers have modified how everybody in Hollywood will get paid.

Most employees are higher off – it’s a vendor’s market – however the energy of the megastars is dimming. Final yr, Scarlett Johansson bought right into a combat with Disney after the studio determined to stream Black Widow on Disney+ on the day of its cinema launch, so retaining as much as $50m it might need owed the actor, relying on the movie’s box-office efficiency. This spat is however probably the most public of a sequence of tussles between studios and stars as actors attempt to decide their price within the branded-franchise period. Henry Cavill has ended his run as Warner Bros’ Superman, whereas Chris Pine and Chris Hemsworth have walked away from Star Trek 4, after contract talks actors broke down over their pay.

So, how a lot is a star price? This has at all times been a darkish science. “So far as the film-making course of is anxious, stars are primarily nugatory and completely important,” stated the screenwriter William Goldman after the collapse of the star system. Free of the studios for the primary time, actors have been capable of negotiate multimillion-dollar offers. For 1989’s Batman, Jack Nicholson took a $6m paycheck and a minimize of the field workplace and merchandise gross sales, finally netting about $60m. The closest latest equal is Robert Downey’s Jr’s $10m price for Iron Man 2, however that was negotiated solely after the success of the primary movie, for which he took house $500,000. Even actors as established as Downey Jr are solely as beneficial because the superheroes they play. In one other position, his value would plummet.

Jack Nicholson as the Joker in Batman
Jack Nicholson because the Joker in Batman. He made about $60m from the movie. {Photograph}: Snap/Rex Options

Streaming has solely additional muddied the waters. Earlier than the pandemic, everybody in Hollywood engaged within the weekly anxious ritual of poring over the weekend’s field workplace, to find out the week’s winners and losers. Now, the streamers pore over viewership information, preserving rating of streaming-app sign-ups and retention charges and measuring unconventional metrics corresponding to mentions on social media as they attempt to decide the quicksilver high quality that could be a star’s price.

However the connection between star and quarterly subscription charge is much more nebulous than that between star and weekly field workplace returns. When massive motion pictures hit HBO Max, downloads of its app spike, a latest examine discovered. One agent confided just lately that a few of their extra well-known purchasers choose the streamers’ secrecy round scores as a result of it avoids the brilliant glare of flopping on the field workplace.

From the celebrities’ standpoint, the connection between their work and their price has been muffled. They may not be paid as exorbitantly for his or her successes, however nor are they blamed so harshly for his or her failures. Certainly, they’re buffeted by the identical financial forces as the remainder of us. “Once we have been content material to gaze up at film stars on a display screen that appeared larger than life, the change was pretty easy,” wrote the critic Ty Burr in Gods Like Us, his 2012 historical past of film stardom. “We paid cash to look at our each day dilemmas acted out on a dreamlike stage, with ourselves recast as individuals who have been prettier, smarter, harder, or simply not as scared.”

James Dean in Rebel Without a Cause
Studio-era stars corresponding to James Dean longed for his or her work to be valued artistically – as is more and more the case with celeb actors. {Photograph}: Snap/Rex Options

In the present day, celebrities attuned to social media are a lot nearer to their audiences. The web has introduced a “marked devaluation of the normal film star”, argued Burr, conspiring to strip film stars of their mystique and marking what he calls “the triumph of celeb socialism. The technique of the manufacturing of stardom are eventually within the palms of the individuals.”

The gods have turn into mortal. One profit is that it has returned a stage of artistry to dialogue of their work. Spend a lot time on the fan websites and you’ll find – instead of the recommendation columns, magnificence ideas, vogue options and recipes that used to fill the fan magazines within the studio period – earnest dialogue of a star’s appearing chops: their “dedication”, “dedication” and “transformation” for a given position. Buzzwords, to make sure, however Brando, James Dean and Montgomery Clift would have killed for such therapy, longing to be seen as Laurence Olivier, not Clark Gable.

“In the present day, actors and actresses float throughout and round stardom,” wrote the movie historian Janine Basinger in The Star Machine, her 2007 historical past of the star system. She recognized the rise of one thing she known as “the neo-star”: the actor who threads the needle between typecasting and character appearing. The outline suits Driver, Lawrence and Cumberbatch, all of whom have moved between massive branded franchises and Oscar-bound movie tasks.

The old-school, Klieg-lit film star could quickly die, however behold, by the sunshine of 1,000,000 smartphones the neo-star is born.

Do you have got an opinion on the problems raised on this article? If you need to submit a letter of as much as 300 phrases to be thought-about for publication, e mail it to us at

Supply hyperlink