On 11 April, South Carolina executed Mikal Mahdi by firing squad. Mahdi had been convicted and sentenced for the 2004 killing of an off-duty regulation enforcement officer.
One month earlier than his execution, South Carolina put Brad Sigmon to dying utilizing the identical methodology. He was the primary individual since 2010 to be killed by the firing squad. Each Mahdi and Sigmon selected the firing squad from a menu of 3 ways to die, the others being deadly injection and the electrical chair.
5 days after Sigmon’s execution, Idaho grew to become the primary state within the nation to make the firing squad its main methodology for placing individuals to dying. It’s one in every of 5 states, together with Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Utah, the place it’s a certified execution methodology.
These developments recommend that dying by firing squad is progressively returning to the capital punishment panorama on this nation. However as Sigmon’s lawyer, after witnessing his execution, remarked: “It’s unfathomable that, in 2025, South Carolina [or any other state] would execute one in every of its residents on this bloody spectacle.”
However whether or not unfathomable or not, the return of the firing squad is, at finest, a blended blessing for dying penalty supporters.
On the one hand, it permits dying penalty states which have had problem acquiring deadly injection medicine to get again into the execution enterprise. South Carolina is one instance of this growth.
On the similar time, the resurrection of the firing squad serves as a vivid and troubling reminder of the brutality of state killing. As such, it undermines the legitimating story of capital punishment in the USA.
As proponents of the dying penalty inform it, that story is one in every of adaptation and progress. Our strategies of execution, they consider, have change into extra civilized. The USA has moved from one methodology of execution to a different in a quest to discover a technique of placing individuals to dying that might sq. with the structure’s prohibition of merciless and strange punishment.
Over the previous century and 1 / 4, reasonably than being uneasy in regards to the novelty of an execution methodology, pro-death-penalty forces have tried to promote it as a bonus. They’ve tied capital punishment’s destiny to technological progress in our capability to kill.
The give attention to expertise as a method of sidelining the ethical query of whether or not we must always use the dying penalty in any respect is a characteristically American view, courting no less than to the nineteenth century. That’s the reason, not like different dying penalty international locations, which have a tendency to stay with one execution methodology over lengthy durations of time, we have now substituted one methodology for one more or added new strategies in order that now, six execution strategies are authorized and licensed on this nation.
In advocating for numerous strategies, dying penalty supporters have targeted on two supposed virtues: novelty, and the discount of ache. A current instance is the embrace of nitrogen hypoxia in Alabama and Louisiana, which could seem to suit that narrative.
First, it’s novel. The nation’s first use of nitrogen hypoxia occurred in January 2024, when Alabama executed Kenneth Eugene Smith.
Second, as Scientific American notes: “On the hearings [in Alabama] the place the strategy was launched, legislators heard tales of pilots and scuba divers dying after they unintentionally breathed pure nitrogen as an alternative of the correct mixture of nitrogen and oxygen.” Their deaths have been fast, proponents of nitrogen hypoxia claimed.
An Oklahoma legislator who launched the invoice authorizing nitrogen hypoxia in his state argued: “The method is quick and painless. It’s foolproof.”
The promise that execution might be quick and painless can be one motive for the firing squad’s revival. One instance of that promise is supplied by the regulation professor Deborah Denno, who says: “The firing squad is the one present type of execution involving educated professionals, and it delivers a swift and sure dying”.
She cites “a 1938 Utah examine – the one one in every of its sort”, which “monitored an inmate whereas he was being executed by a firing squad and it confirmed the dying occurred in underneath a minute”. That’s the reason “it actually ought to be introduced again … if we’re going to proceed to have the dying penalty.”
CNN quotes one other skilled, Dr Jonathan Groner, a professor of surgical procedure at Ohio State College School of Medication, who claims that the firing squad “is believed to trigger almost prompt unconsciousness … firing bullets into an individual’s coronary heart would immediately cease the blood stream to the mind, which, like a cardiac arrest, causes fast lack of mind perform”.
Or, because the Idaho state consultant Bruce Skaug, one of many sponsors of the not too long ago enacted firing squad invoice, defined: “At first whenever you hear firing squad, when you’re not conversant in the historical past, you suppose ‘effectively, that sounds barbaric,’ is what I’ve heard from some … It’s sure. It’s fast.
Whether or not or not that’s the case, this a part of the story in regards to the firing squad matches in effectively with the progress story about strategies of execution. But it surely doesn’t match effectively with the story’s dedication to novelty in execution strategies.
Certainly, its use on this nation dates again to 1608, when Capt George Kendall in Virginia was executed for being a spy for Spain. And, because the New York Instances reviews, in the course of the Civil Battle, “each Union and Accomplice troops used firing squads to kill deserting troopers. The executions have been supposed to encourage concern, as they have been sometimes carried out in public.”
Of all execution strategies, the firing squad has been used the least. About 140 individuals have been executed that method within the US. That’s a couple of tenth of the overall variety of deadly injection executions.
The firing squad has been used so not often as a result of it’s so violent. It mimics the very factor that it’s meant to discourage.
When states like Idaho or South Carolina carry again this relic of a bygone period, they sign the weak point, not energy, of the pro-death penalty forces at this second within the historical past of capital punishment. Determined to kill, they might take us “again to the long run” on the planet of execution strategies.
“The firing squad,” as Professor Corrina Lain observes, “exhibits what the dying penalty is, which is the state shedding blood in your identify.”
The execution of Mikal Mahdi was a vivid reminder of that reality. His dying is simply the newest second for all of us “to know,” as supreme court docket justice Sonia Sotomayor places it, “the worth of our collective consolation … earlier than we blindly permit a state to make condemned inmates pay it in our names.”
-
Austin Sarat, William Nelson Cromwell professor of jurisprudence and political science at Amherst School, is the creator or editor of greater than 100 hundred books, together with Grotesque Spectacles: Botched Executions and America’s Loss of life Penalty
Supply hyperlink