Site icon Liliana News

The Guardian view on the Washington DC aircraft crash: Trump’s warped priorities | Editorial

The Guardian view on the Washington DC aircraft crash: Trump’s warped priorities | Editorial

Few stretches of airspace on the planet are as busy or as fastidiously monitored because the skies above Washington DC. Business and navy plane are on the transfer there always. The best focus is round Reagan Nationwide airport, town’s principal home hub, which sits on the west financial institution of the Potomac River within reach of the Capitol dome.

Nobody but is aware of how a Black Hawk navy helicopter collided with an American Eagle flight from Wichita above the Potomac on Wednesday night. However the destruction was whole. No survivors have been discovered from among the many 64 folks on board the flight from Kansas or among the many three-strong crew of the helicopter. By early Thursday, the rescue effort was already a restoration operation. Our bodies had been being lifted from the river’s icy waters by way of the day.

Mass-fatality airplane crashes are mercifully uncommon. The final one within the US was in 2009. However a crash in such a delicate location, the place plane congestion has been an ongoing controversy, will at all times entice uncommon consideration. It was additionally all too possible that the human tragedy would develop into a pawn within the jarring politics of the second Donald Trump administration, which has already turned its vengeful beam on the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which regulates civil aviation, airports and air visitors management methods.

That chance duly grew to become a certainty inside hours of Wednesday’s catastrophe, when Mr Trump posted his personal provocative model of the questions he believes are posed by the crash. “Why didn’t the helicopter go up or down, or flip?” he requested. “Why didn’t the management tower inform the helicopter what to do as an alternative of asking in the event that they noticed the aircraft?” The crash “seems prefer it ought to have been prevented. NOT GOOD!!!”

By any regular requirements, this is able to have been a unprecedented intervention. However it is a president who, in his first week within the White Home, had already picked an inflammatory battle with the FAA over security. Final week, in an government order, he ordered it to finish the variety, fairness and inclusion guidelines in its hiring coverage. He additionally ordered the company to evaluation the efficiency and requirements of all FAA workers in “vital security positions”. Tasteless and inappropriate although it’s, Mr Trump’s publish indicators his readiness – which he did nothing in any respect to dispel in Thursday’s press convention – accountable the FAA for the Potomac tragedy.

However it could additionally spotlight a sure vulnerability. There is no such thing as a direct connection between Mr Trump’s dedication to slash the federal workforce, truncating its regulatory features, and this week’s midair crash. However his formidable assault on the position and energy of presidency, carried out behind a smokescreen of anti-diversity propaganda, sits uneasily alongside tendentious assaults on a trusted air visitors management system on which the general public has simply been forcefully reminded that it relies upon.

If that’s the case, it could align with different indicators that Mr Trump’s administration is not going to have issues fairly its personal means. This week, the president tried to freeze all authorities grants and loans, placing in danger programmes starting from catastrophe reduction to most cancers analysis. The transfer prompted chaos for claimants and workers. However a choose has now stayed that effort, and Republican lawmakers are dealing with a political backlash. It will be some comfort if this horrible lack of life, underscoring the uncompromisable significance of public security, prompted the same public and political response towards Mr Trump’s shameless try to wreck the FAA.

  • Do you will have an opinion on the problems raised on this article? If you need to submit a response of as much as 300 phrases by e mail to be thought-about for publication in our letters part, please click on right here.


Supply hyperlink
Exit mobile version