The choice of Tim Walz as Kamala Harris’ operating mate has sparked a wave of commentary suggesting that just by elevating a former small-town soccer coach to the candidacy for vice chairman, Democrats will naturally safe the allegiance of rural voters nationwide.
At first look, such evaluation – tinged with wishful considering – appears self-evident. Walz, the governor of Minnesota, was raised in a small, rural city in Nebraska and runs a Midwestern state with a robust rural identification. And it’s arduous to disclaim that many rural advocates and writers genuinely really feel seen and represented with the selection of Walz – a sense not felt in fairly a while. Certainly, now you can sport a Harris-Walz camo hat this looking season.
However a more in-depth examination reveals that such expectations could also be overly simplistic and optimistic.
Tom Williams/CQ Roll Name/Getty Pictures
Nationalization of the agricultural voter
Whereas Walz’s choice could provide symbolic worth, it calls for a variety of a single candidate to beat a seismic restructuring of American political geography. Over the previous 40 years, as political scientist Dan Shea and I present in our guide “The Rural Voter,” Republican partisans have come to dominate rural politics.
In a single respect, Walz has constructed his profession making an attempt to reverse that tide, advocating for communities just like the one he got here from. His positions are, after all, open to interpretation, however Walz has needed to grapple with what we name the “nationalization” of the agricultural voting bloc – the truth that rural voters in all components of the nation view themselves as politically powerless, victims of unhealthy authorities coverage and culturally maligned.
Whereas photographs of corn dog-eating, dad-joking, “Midwestern Good” folksiness have change into routine in protecting Walz, they do little to elucidate the actual points which have made rural voters a large power in latest American elections.
Over the previous 40 years, this politicized identification has come to tell apart rural voters from city ones, and even from different teams which are predisposed to vote for Republican or conservative candidates. Drawing on a nationally consultant pattern of seven,500 rural voters from February 2024, I joined 15 different students in digging into these views.
“Midwestern Good” does little to seize the grievance and nervousness felt by many rural residents dwelling throughout the nation. As a number of indicators counsel, majorities of rural residents suppose their communities get much less authorities spending than they deserve, that native youngsters is not going to do in addition to their mother and father later in life, and that a lot of that is the fault of urbanites. On this entrance, the Midwest is not any completely different than the remainder of the nation.
Restricted success in rural contests
Given the truth that rural voters within the Midwest are very similar to the remainder of the nation, Walz’s efficiency inside his residence state of Minnesota is a related bellwether for his nationwide attraction amongst rural voters. Although Walz has deep rural roots, rural voters haven’t at all times supported him as a lot as his backstory may rapidly counsel.
In six elections over the previous eight years, populist candidates for main workplaces in higher Midwestern states have seen differing ranges of success in rural components of their districts or states. Utilizing the vote share that every candidate obtained from majority-rural counties – counties the place the agricultural inhabitants is greater than 50% of the entire – as a proxy for rural assist each district- and statewide, Walz’s efficiency has decreased amongst rural voters since he final ran for reelection to Congress in 2016. It doesn’t exceed the assist different candidates within the Midwest obtained from comparable rural-majority counties.
I calculated the p.c of the inhabitants dwelling in a census-defined rural bloc for Walz’s former congressional district and the state of Minnesota. I then calculated the p.c of Walz’s vote share that got here from rural-majority counties in every of his previous three elections, one for Congress and the opposite two for governor.
Like different Democrats in districts throughout the nation, Walz struggled to win rural voters in his congressional district – Minnesota’s First District – and statewide. Neither of these are majority-rural constituencies, however even when simply wanting on the most rural areas, Walz by no means gained a majority. In actual fact, his largest losses operating for reelection as governor in 2022 had been in rural communities. That 12 months, Walz captured simply 38% of the vote in rural-majority counties throughout Minnesota.
Some may see this as proof that no Democrat might do nicely in rural America. If not the folksy Walz, then who, they could ask?
Simply look subsequent door.
In Walz’s personal Midwest area, different Democrats have carried out strongly amongst rural constituencies. U.S. Sens. Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota carried out almost as robust as their Republican opponents inside probably the most rural components of their voters. Even Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer outperformed Walz’s rural numbers.
That’s proper, if Democrats needed a candidate from the Midwest on the nationwide ticket who did higher with rural voters, Harris-Whitmer would have a greater observe document of rural assist. And price noting: Whitmer, Baldwin and Klobuchar every grew up in cities.
Managing Democrats’ expectations
None of that is to say that Democrats have made a mistake by taking part in into the agricultural or small-town trope that many have enthusiastically conjured over Walz’s candidacy. Walz is a transparent counterbalance to the picture constructed by one other Midwestern, self-proclaimed spokesperson for rural America on the poll: JD Vance.
A latest Washington Submit ballot on the 2 vice presidential nominees’ reputation exhibits that Walz has secured a marginal geographic benefit amongst voters throughout the U.S. In city areas, about 20% of voters dislike Vance greater than like him. Amongst rural respondents, simply 14% of voters dislike Walz greater than like him. Walz, nonetheless, continues to be much less widespread than widespread amongst rural voters, whereas Vance is considered favorably, on common.
However it’s value remembering that the most well-liked candidate to ever win rural America neither hails from a rural America nor pretends to. Donald Trump’s attraction lies not in his private connection to rural life however in his capacity to faucet into the emotions of rural discontent and align them together with his broader political message. Trump has proven that the politics of rural identification don’t simply translate to easy identification politics.
It shouldn’t be arduous to discover a candidate who gained’t disdain rural voters as a basket of deplorables, as Hillary Clinton famously did within the 2016 presidential marketing campaign. Nor ought to it’s arduous to discover a candidate who believes that exhibiting up in rural areas isn’t just good technique however good for democracy.
However Walz’s problem is just not merely to current a rural-friendly picture.
It’s addressing the deeper points that encourage rural voters, resembling financial insecurity, perceived cultural marginalization and mistrust in authorities. Symbolic gestures – and camo hats – alone usually are not adequate to sway their assist.
Supply hyperlink