Karen Learn’s legal professionals declare a fourth juror has come ahead to say the jury unanimously acquitted her of murdering her Boston cop boyfriend — however that the mistrial was declared in a “very complicated second.”
“Juror D informed me that he/she determined to achieve out to me as a result of he/she was ‘uncomfortable’ with how the trial ended,” Learn’s protection legal professional Alan Jackson wrote in a court docket submitting submitted Wednesday, claiming the juror informed him they’d comply with acquit on Depend 1 for second-degree homicide, and Depend 3 for leaving the scene of a deadly crash.
“The disagreement was solely as to Depend 2 and its lesser offenses,” Jackson continued, referring to the cost of manslaughter whereas working a motorized vehicle underneath the affect of liquor.
“Juror D defined that the jury truly mentioned telling the decide that they’d agreed unanimously on NOT GUILTY verdicts for Counts 1 and three, however that they weren’t positive in the event that they had been allowed to say so,” the submitting learn.
The most recent declare straight contradicts the jury foreman’s notes to Decide Beverly Cannone — together with the ultimate message on July 1 that jurors had been deadlocked on account of “deeply held beliefs.”
The foreman stated, “The deep division just isn’t because of an absence of effort or diligence, however reasonably a honest adherence to our particular person ideas and ethical codes” and requested that the decide not pressure jurors to try to compromise their beliefs concerning the case.
The decide then declared a mistrial. Beforehand, she had learn the jury a particular set of directions which might be given to jurors if they’ll’t attain settlement.
The Norfolk County District legal professional stated July 1 that he would search to re-try the case.
On Monday, Jackson submitted a court docket submitting claiming three jurors had informed him all 12 members of the jury agreed Learn not responsible of homicide. Jackson requested that cost be thrown out. Wednesday’s submitting concerning the fourth juror was added as a complement to the unique movement.
In it, Jackson claimed the jurors felt “very uncomfortable” {that a} mistrial was declared as a result of their opinion on every depend was by no means requested.
“Is anybody going to know that we acquitted on Depend 1 and three? Nobody ever requested about these counts,” Jackson stated the juror informed him.
“It didn’t really feel proper,” the juror reportedly stated, including that, “each certainly one of us will agree and acknowledge that we discovered [Karen Read] NOT GUILTY of Counts 1 and three. As a result of that’s what occurred.”
Jackson claimed the jurors who spoke out felt attempting Learn for homicide and manslaughter could be “unjust” given the verdicts they reached however weren’t made recognized in court docket.
Learn is accused of murdering her boyfriend John O’Keefe by working him down together with her automotive whereas drunk on the night time of January 29, 2022, and leaving him to die in a snowbank exterior a cop good friend’s dwelling.
Throughout the two-month trial — which known as on 74 witnesses — Learn’s protection argued that she was framed by O’Keefe’s cop friends, and that they’d truly overwhelmed him up and left him to die within the snow.
She faces life in jail if convicted of homicide.
Supply hyperlink
