Jennifer Aniston’s Proustian haircut – a portal to a happier time | Zoe Williams

0
5
Jennifer Aniston’s Proustian haircut – a portal to a happier time | Zoe Williams

Jennifer Aniston arrived on the Golden Globes sporting the identical haircut she had when she performed Rachel Inexperienced, within the earliest years of Buddies. It stopped many star-gazers useless of their tracks, as a result of the general public file is kind of clear on this: Aniston hated that look, pondering it was ugly. However she dusted it off anyway, as a present of cultural nostalgia, a portal again to an harmless time, when Matthew Perry was nonetheless alive and younger folks might afford to pay hire, and the world was stuffed with promise – and, for a woman with the fitting highlights, nothing might stand in her method. If Aniston can alter this little, after this a lot time, perhaps nothing is as completely different because it feels?

However the extra highly effective hit of occasions previous got here from Gillian Anderson’s gown: it seemed elegant, unremarkable, perhaps slightly bridal, even. Nothing to see right here, only a fine-looking girl in white. Look nearer, and also you’ll see it’s embroidered; nearer nonetheless, that the sample is like nothing you’ve seen earlier than. She referred to as it her vagina gown, which was very on-brand, given her function because the intercourse therapist mum in Intercourse Schooling, but on the identical time very off-brand, as a result of these are literally vulvas.

Gillian Anderson’s Golden Globes gown. {Photograph}: Mike Blake/Reuters

Anderson selected it “for thus many causes”, she instructed a flustered reporter on the crimson carpet, leaving the world to invest on what precise mixture it represented: between a defence of feminine reproductive autonomy, a reclamation of the yoni from the forces of patriarchal squeamishness and a large, “effectively, you didn’t see that coming, did you?” It will have been much less satisfying if she’d worn this within the X-Recordsdata years, as a result of we wouldn’t have had X to put up our ideas on, and subsequently would have missed out on the collective baffled delight, with the compulsory chaser of vulva/vagina pedantry that I’ll at all times be blissful so as to add to. And but it did really feel very 90s in spirit, a sort of exuberant, provocative “by no means thoughts precisely what it means; suffice to say, it means I’ll put on what I like”.

Zoe Williams is a Guardian columnist


Supply hyperlink