Monday, November 28, 2022
HomeU.S.A‘I need blood’: Rachel Maddow’s viewers fired up over NYT story baselessly...

‘I need blood’: Rachel Maddow’s viewers fired up over NYT story baselessly accusing ‘Russian hackers’ of attacking US hospital

By Nebojsa Malic, senior author at RT

Accusing Russia of hacking something from the 2016 election to US most cancers hospitals could also be enjoyable and video games for MSNBC host Rachel Maddow, however when her viewers responds by demanding apocalypse, the shtick stops being humorous.

Maddow’s conspiracy theories about ‘Russian collusion’ and supposed hacking of the 2016 election that resulted in President Donald Trump have been a staple of MSNBC audiences over the previous 4 years. She’s not giving up that routine now, at the same time as your complete mainstream media machine has turned on a dime and insists that the 2020 election was flawless – because it resulted in Democrat Joe Biden’s victory, that’s.

On Monday, Maddow cherry-picked a few quotes and linked a New York Instances story – printed final week – about ‘Russian’ hackers allegedly focusing on the College of Vermont Medical Middle final month.

The Instances story is lengthy on emotions and feelings of the medical personnel and most cancers sufferers affected by the truth that the UVMC computer systems stopped working, however brief on precise details in regards to the case. It really works in a jab at President Donald Trump for firing head of the cybersecurity company Chris Krebs – for disputing “baseless claims of voter fraud,” after all – although that occurred lengthy after the alleged assault.

The story additionally notes that the FBI has requested the middle directors to chorus from commenting on the case – even to substantiate or deny their very own statements about alleged ransom requests. Absent the details, the Instances is blissful to fill within the blanks by citing a personal cybersecurity firm, Maintain Safety.

Maintain Safety and its chief govt Alex Holden are the only real supply for the declare that ‘Russian’ hackers have been behind the alleged cyberattack on UVMC and different US hospitals – no less than based on the Instances, in addition to the media protection of the FBI’s warning in late October that Maddow referenced. 

Additionally on
FBI warns of ‘imminent cybercrime risk to US HOSPITALS,’ sending media & pundits into overdrive accountable ‘Russian hackers’

The entire thing sounds very like the debunked Instances story about Russia allegedly paying “bounties” to the Taliban for killing US troops in Afghanistan, a June bombshell that was used to hammer Trump and oppose his efforts to finish the limitless US warfare there.

Even the Pentagon’s personal denials didn’t make a distinction; Maddow and her colleagues have been “all in” on the bounties story being true. So was her viewers, as evidenced by a few of the replies to her tweet.

Whereas a lot of the replies have been in the identical vein, there have been some that crossed the road from partisanship into genocidal – and apocalyptic – requires blood.

“Russia must lastly be dealt with. They must be knocked again into the stone age,” mentioned one follower.

“I didn’t hate the leaders of the previous Soviet Union as a lot as I hate the leaders of Russia proper now. I need them to expertise monumental, historic, unprecedented, apocalyptic ache for what they’ve executed to us. I need blood,” mentioned one other.

Earlier this 12 months, MSNBC’s legal professionals defended Maddow towards a defamation lawsuit by One America Information (OANN) – whom she referred to as “actually Russian propaganda” – by arguing her present isn’t information however opinion, and that her assertion was “rhetorical hyperbole” that no affordable particular person would perceive as truth.

Whereas that admission acquired Maddow and MSNBC off the authorized hook, it raises the query of what number of of her followers and their viewers qualify as “affordable” folks – because the feedback on her tweet in regards to the Instances story present anew.

Additionally on
‘Rhetorical hyperbole’ and NOT FACT: Courtroom rejects OAN go well with over MSNBC host Rachel Maddow’s declare about ‘Russian propaganda’

Nobody, Maddow included, must be held legally accountable for the content material of their replies, clearly. It’s one thing past their management. However when a gentle food regimen of propaganda, ‘insinuendo’ and conspiracy theories introduced as details creates an environment that outcomes on this form of bloodthirst that’s on show, it doesn’t encourage confidence in her viewers’s psychological state.

Remember that the politicians Maddow helps might quickly find yourself with absolute energy, if Trump’s claims about election fraud are actually as “baseless” because the media declare. Additionally, don’t overlook that the US and Russia have sufficient nuclear weapons between themselves to destroy all life on the planet. And that’s one thing folks so obsessive about their emotions to be calling for “monumental, historic, unprecedented, apocalyptic ache” clearly haven’t given any thought.

For those who like this story, share it with a buddy!

Supply hyperlink

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Recent Comments

English EN Spanish ES French FR Portuguese PT German DE