Wednesday, May 18, 2022
HomeUK big removes women’ gown over ‘Lollita’ controversy big removes women’ gown over ‘Lollita’ controversy

Widespread UK clothes chain John Lewis has yanked a toddler’s celebration gown from its web site following outrage over the merchandise’s provocative product identify – “Lollita gown” – evoked the notorious Nabokov pedophilia novel by the same identify.

The “Chi Chi London Ladies’ Lollita Occasion Costume” was marketed for kids three to 11 years previous for £50 ($66) on John Lewis’ web site. It was described as “positive to change into a partywear favourite” and stated to function “delicate metallic embroidery, scalloped edges and a chiffon skirt with tulle underlay that’s excellent for twirling on the dance ground.”

Dad and mom of the younger women who’d theoretically be carrying the gown, nevertheless, weren’t moved by the outline a lot as by the identify of the product itself, which is one letter off from ‘Lolita’, the basic Vladimir Nabokov novel detailing a forbidden pedophilic affair between an getting older professor and his 12-year-old lust object Dolores Haze (“Lolita”), whom he grooms over the course of the narrative.

The identify possible drew an excellent larger response as a result of ongoing sex-trafficking trial of British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell. She was allegedly the chief procurer for Jeffrey Epstein, the now-deceased convicted intercourse offender who infamously flew round in a non-public airplane known as the “Lolita Specific” with a bevy of underage women accompanying him to manage “erotic massages” and be lent out to his highly effective buddies.

Lolita additionally refers to a Japanese trend subculture influenced by Victorian-era clothes, and typically referred to extra particularly as “Elegant Gothic Lolita.”

TV presenter Victoria Coren Mitchell tweeted a photograph of the itemizing (which has since been faraway from John Lewis’ website) and requested her followers what the worst identify for a youngsters’s celebration gown may presumably be, displaying the image as if to reply the query. 

The chain apologized “for the upset” by a spokesperson, noting it had eliminated the product from sale as quickly because it was notified (although it’s not clear whether or not the notification got here by social media protection or direct contact).

You may share this story on social media:

Supply hyperlink

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Recent Comments

English English German German Portuguese Portuguese Spanish Spanish