Forcing cyclists to show quantity plates can be impractical, minister warned



ransport Secretary Grant Shapps has been broadly condemned after asserting a plan which may drive cyclists to show registration plates.

Motoring specialists, transport teams, authorized specialists and opposition events criticised the proposal, describing it as “impractical”, “unusual” and “a retrograde step”.

Lower than a fortnight after vowing to create a “dying by harmful biking” legislation that may deal with killer cyclists the identical as motorists, the Cupboard minister stated he wished to cease sure behaviour on the roads.

His plan may contain a requirement for cyclists to show quantity plates and purchase insurance coverage, in addition to face prosecution for breaking highway pace limits.

That is regardless of practically 60 instances extra pedestrians being killed in collisions with vehicles than bicycles, and plenty of cyclists not with the ability to attain even 20mph.

Mr Shapps informed the Day by day Mail newspaper: “Someplace the place cyclists are literally not breaking the legislation is after they pace, and that can’t be proper, so I completely suggest extending pace restrict restrictions to cyclists.

They wouldn’t cope with highway hazard, they’d make biking costlier in a cost-of-living disaster, and discourage individuals from biking in a local weather disaster

“Notably the place you’ve obtained 20mph limits on rising numbers of roads, cyclists can simply exceed these, so I need to make pace limits apply to cyclists.

“That clearly does then lead you into the query of, ‘Nicely, how are you going to recognise the bike owner? Do you want registration plates and insurance coverage? And that type of factor’.

“So I’m proposing there ought to be a overview of insurance coverage and the way you truly monitor cyclists who do break the legal guidelines.”

After his quotes have been revealed on-line, Mr Shapps gave an interview to the Occasions by which he stated he was “not interested in the paperwork of registration plates”, including that such a transfer “would go too far”.

The Division for Transport (DfT) press workplace later clarified it isn’t Authorities coverage to introduce pace limits for cyclists and any proposals would should be reviewed by the brand new prime minister.

A spokeswoman for the division stated: “Whereas there are not any plans to introduce registration plates on bicycles, we proceed to take a look at how we will enhance highway security throughout all types of transport and we’re contemplating bringing ahead laws to introduce new offences round harmful biking.”

In November, roads minister Baroness Vere stated the Authorities has “no plans to introduce a compulsory registration scheme for cycle possession” as the prices of doing so would outweigh the advantages and it could “deter many individuals from biking”.

Duncan Dollimore, Biking UK’s head of campaigns, informed the PA information company the proposals to control biking are “impractical and unworkable”, and have been “repeatedly dismissed by successive governments”.

He added that extra persons are biking because of the cost-of-living disaster and the Authorities ought to “encourage individuals to cycle extra, not much less”.

Simon Munk, campaigns supervisor at London Biking Marketing campaign, stated the proposals have already been deemed “unworkable and dear to implement” by DfT officers.

Transport Secretary Grant Shapps stated ‘there ought to be a overview of insurance coverage and the way you truly monitor cyclists’ (Stefan Rousseau/PA) / PA Wire

He continued: “They wouldn’t cope with highway hazard, they’d make biking costlier in a cost-of-living disaster, and discourage individuals from biking in a local weather disaster.”

Mr Munk branded the plan “a distraction”, including that a number of biking organisations already supply free insurance coverage to members as a result of “the insurable harm attributable to these biking is small”.

AA president Edmund King stated introducing extra limitations to biking can be “a retrograde step”.

He added: “Most grownup cyclists are additionally drivers, and subsequently extra ought to be executed to encourage concord on the roads.”

Nicola Corridor, a private damage solicitor at legislation agency Osbornes Regulation, which represents injured cyclists, stated Mr Shapps’ feedback have been “an unprecedented assault on cyclists who as a substitute of going through extra legal guidelines ought to be getting higher safety”.

She added: “Aside from the truth that these plans are fully impractical they’re additionally an insult to cyclists who typically take their lives of their fingers by going onto the roads, particularly in busy cities, and so they should be deserted instantly.”

Labour’s shadow transport minister Gill Furniss stated: “Buses are in disaster, rail providers are being slashed, fares and gasoline are hovering – and the Transport Secretary’s huge thought is to slap quantity plates on tens of hundreds of thousands of bicycles.

“This absurd and unworkable plan would create a mountain of paperwork for cyclists, and drive individuals away from lively journey.”

Liberal Democrats transport spokesperson Wera Hobhouse described the plan as “unusual and pointless”, claiming it could “pile additional prices on to people who find themselves making an attempt to be extra lively”.

DfT figures present 304 pedestrians have been injured and 4 have been killed after being hit by bicycles in Britain in 2020.

That’s in contrast with 11,493 accidents and 237 deaths in collisions with vehicles.

The Freeway Code and Highway Site visitors Act rushing limits solely apply to motor automobiles and their drivers. Whereas native authorities can impose pace limits on cyclists, it has been hardly ever executed.

Supply hyperlink