Friday, October 7, 2022
HomeUKExcessive Court docket choose to rule on ‘Wagatha Christie’ libel trial

Excessive Court docket choose to rule on ‘Wagatha Christie’ libel trial

In a viral social media publish in October 2019, Mrs Rooney, 36, stated she had carried out a “sting operation” and accused Mrs Vardy, 40, of leaking “false tales” about her non-public life to the press.

The spouse of former England star Wayne Rooney publicly claimed Mrs Vardy’s account was the supply behind three pretend tales she had posted on her non-public Instagram account.

Rebekah Vardy leaves the Royal Courts Of Justice, London (Jonathan Brady/PA) / PA Wire

Mrs Vardy, who’s married to Leicester Metropolis striker Jamie Vardy, denied leaking the tales and sued her fellow footballer’s spouse for libel, whereas Mrs Rooney defended the declare on the idea her publish was “considerably true”.

After a highly-publicised libel trial in Might, choose Mrs Justice Steyn is now as a result of publish her ruling at noon on Friday.

Over seven days in courtroom quantity 13 on the Royal Courts of Justice, the 2 footballers’ wives every gave proof as revelations from the case made every day headlines throughout the British press.

Throughout the trial, Mrs Rooney’s barrister David Sherborne argued that Mrs Vardy had a “recurring and established observe” of leaking details about these she knew – via her pal and former agent Caroline Watt – to The Solar newspaper.

Discussing Mrs Rooney’s viral “reveal” publish, her barrister added: “It’s what she believed on the time… and it’s what she believes much more so now that we now have acquired to the tip of the case.”

Coleen and Wayne Rooney leaving the Royal Courts Of Justice, London (Yui Mok/PA) / PA Wire

Nevertheless, Hugh Tomlinson QC, for Mrs Vardy, stated Mrs Rooney had “failed to provide any proof” that Mrs Vardy had “recurrently and steadily abused her standing as a trusted follower” of her non-public Instagram account by passing on info from it to The Solar.

Mr Tomlinson stated the libel battle was a “quite simple case” when “one clears away the conspiracy theories”.

He added: “Mrs Vardy’s case is and all the time has been that she didn’t leak the knowledge nor did she authorise anybody else to leak.

“She doesn’t know to this present day what occurred. She doesn’t know the place this info got here from.”

The barrister added that Mrs Vardy suffered “very severe hurt to her status” on account of Mrs Rooney’s publish.

Supply hyperlink

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Recent Comments

English EN Spanish ES French FR Portuguese PT German DE