The 164-page counterclaim, which was filed confidentially, got here hours after Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick of the Delaware Courtroom of Chancery ordered a five-day trial starting October 17 to find out if Musk can stroll away from the deal.
Twitter has not instantly commented on the go well with.
Musk was additionally sued Friday by a Twitter shareholder who requested the court docket to order the billionaire to shut the deal, on the grounds that he breached his fiduciary responsibility to Twitter shareholders and to award damages for losses precipitated.
That lawsuit claims the entrepreneur owes Twitter’s shareholders a fiduciary responsibility as a result of he has a 9.6 per cent stake within the firm, and the takeover settlement gave him a veto over many firm choices.
The lawsuit was filed by Luigi Crispo, who owns 5,500 Twitter shares, within the Courtroom of Chancery.
Musk, the world’s richest particular person, stated earlier this month he was abandoning the Twitter takeover bid, blaming the social media big for breaking the settlement by misrepresenting what number of “bots” there have been.
Twitter countersued the Tesla head days later, calling the faux account claims a distraction and saying Musk was obliged to shut the deal at $54.20 (£44.50) a share.
Musk had additionally discipline a movement to attempt to cease the social media firm’s trial, together with his legal professionals Twitter’s lawsuit was the most recent tactic “to shroud the reality about spam accounts lengthy sufficient to railroad defendants into closing”.
Choose McCormick fast-tracked the case to trial final week, saying she wished to restrict the potential hurt to Twitter brought on by the uncertainty of the deal.
Twitter has blamed the court docket combat for hitting revenues and inflicting chaos throughout the firm.
Either side stay at odds over limits of discovery, or entry to paperwork and different proof, in the course of the trial.
Musk accused Twitter this week of dragging its ft in response to his discovery requests, and Twitter accused him of searching for big quantities of knowledge which might be irrelevant to the case.
The chief choose in her order on Friday appeared to foretell additional discovery disputes to return.
“This order doesn’t resolve any particular discovery disputes, together with the propriety of any requests for big information units,” stated Choose McCormick.