Biking UK mentioned it was asking legal professionals whether or not there have been grounds to hunt a judicial evaluation on the premise that Kensington and Chelsea council had acted “unreasonably”.
The Tory council infuriated cyclists by eradicating the “pop-up” lanes on both facet of the Excessive Avenue after solely seven weeks. The lanes had been funded with £320,000 of Authorities money to encourage folks to stroll and cycle throughout the pandemic.
Duncan Dollimore, Biking UK’s head of campaigns mentioned: “Biking UK is alarmed that choices some councils have made in current weeks, ripping out cycle lanes, have been knee jerk responses to objections from a vocal minority fairly than upon consideration of the proof and advantages of the schemes.”
It’s also looking for recommendation on the removing of a lane in Shoreham that had just lately featured in a Division for Transport movie selling short-term bike lanes.
Kensington and Chelsea council started eradicating the lanes in a single day final week after compaings from some companies and residents, although its first try was blocked by Extinction Insurrection campaigners. The removing of the lanes is costing the council £30,000.
Biking UK mentioned that because the lanes have been eliminated “there was no discernible profit by way of congestion discount”.
It’s involved that cycle lanes and traffic-calming measures are being eliminated “with out ample analysis of their advantages, and with out ample time to conduct efficient trials”.
Upon receipt of the authorized recommendation, Biking UK will contemplate the potential of motion the place cycle lanes that have been working for folks and communities have been eliminated both unreasonably or the place the right course of has not been adopted.
This is able to contain looking for a judicial evaluation of the council’s actions within the Excessive Court docket.
Mr Dollimore mentioned: “Separated cycle lanes can carry extra folks in much less area, and scale back congestion.
“They’re good for native companies, with folks biking and strolling into city centres staying there longer and spending more cash; and the proof reveals that in the event you construct them, folks will use them.
“However altering engrained journey habits doesn’t all the time occur in a single day, so when councils introduce short-term cycle lanes they should go away them in place for lengthy sufficient to hold out an efficient trial. ‘Who shouts loudest’ shouldn’t be the premise of their analysis – and earlier than any drastic motion is taken to scrap new bike lanes.”
Mayor Sadiq Khan mentioned final week that he was contemplating all choices in relation to Kensington Excessive Avenue, which is a council street. This might probably contain it turning into a Transport for London street, permitting the lanes to be reinstated.
TfL, which had distributed the Authorities money to Kensington and Chelsea council, has written to the council to demand an evidence for the removing of the lanes.
TfL roads chief Gareth Powell advised the TfL board on Wednesday that officers have been “shocked and disenchanted” with the council’s resolution to take away the cycle lanes.
“That may be a facility that has been funded at the beginning of the Mayor’s Streetspace programme. We now have regarded on the information and we don’t essentially perceive totally but why that call was taken. We now have written to the council to ask them to tell us, so we will perceive totally their rationale. We now have but to obtain a response to our letters on that topic.
“These are short-term schemes however we’re eager to present them ample time to ensure that they’re helpful, as certainly that scheme was proving to be, in our view.”