Once once more the hole between politics and media, on one hand, and most of the people, on the opposite, continues to be revealed in its scale. Survey after survey carry us the information that issues are altering. That the British public is turning into extra progressive in perspective in the direction of refugees and asylum seekers, immigration, unions and industrial motion, internet zero targets and, most not too long ago, British historical past.
The Nationwide Centre for Social Analysis’s British social attitudes survey exhibits a rustic that has turn into much less nationalistic and jingoistic and, most sharply, much less “proud” or “very proud” of British historical past. Together with that, there have been additionally declines in delight in Britain’s democracy, its political affect and its financial achievements. The one two spheres the place delight remained fixed and excessive have been sport, and artwork and literature.
A few of these adjustments are demographic, or the results of “generational substitute”, in accordance with the survey. Youthful generations’ concept of Britishness revolves round a “civic identification” fairly than an ethnic one. And whereas 70% of individuals over 65 really feel “it is vital for somebody to have been born in Britain”, solely 41% of these underneath 35 really feel the identical.
There’s an ethnic angle as properly, with youthful, extra various generations being much less more likely to be tethered to historic notions of Britishness as a deposit of empire or ethnic heritage that must be preserved. And a few of these adjustments will be attributed to the growing connective tissue between people who has changed shared uniform notions of nationwide identification. As an alternative, there’s an emergence of latest shared references and experiences that create civic notions of belonging, relatability and kinship : the type of artwork, literature and sport that rating so extremely on the delight barometer.
Studying surveys is like studying tea leaves – as a result of we now have outcomes fairly than reasoning – however it’s troublesome to think about that, even after factoring in generational substitute, the elevating of questions on empire, historical past, enslavement and the legacies of colonialism by a complete cohort of writers, lecturers, media organisations, cultural establishments and researchers has not performed an element in lots of divesting from historical past as a supply of nationwide delight. They’ve needed to face down not simply backlash and condemnation from triggered members of the general public, however from the media and the political sphere. The brand new Britain that’s rising is one which has come about organically and over time, however additionally it is one which has been dragged there.
In that course of, the competition is framed by critics of reappraisal as one between those that need to see solely the dangerous in British historical past and people who additionally need to recognise the nice. In actuality, the competition is between those that search for sources of identification in notions of supremacy, and people who do in markers of equality. In different phrases, overreliance on historical past, defensiveness about it and an insistence on seeing it as one thing that claims one thing particular about British character betray a insecurity, a fragility and a resistance to much less hierarchical conceptions of identification. If we dispense with a definition of nationwide character that has been expressed solely when it comes to exceptionalism prior to now, then what replaces it?
As soon as that query is requested and handled as official, all method of dangers are launched. If we glance to our present nation, one whose options are expressed so strongly within the survey, then one has to reckon with all kinds of uncomfortable realities that some need to deny. That postwar immigration and the variety it has resulted in have modified the nation’s racial and political character irreversibly. That ethnicity alone is not a assure of standing. And that our place on this planet is undermined by overlapping financial crises and neighborhood fractures. Trendy life, in brief, is atomising and anxiousness inducing. All of the extra so when topic to the type of austerity that weakens public areas and providers, and creates an existence that one more and more has to navigate fairly than thrive in.
For the type of delight that rests in our historic political and financial prowess, one has to go looking very arduous in a gift the place actuality for these apart from a privileged few is more and more about managing the rising price of housing, transport, power and meals, and the state of the NHS and education, all whereas contending with Brexit-induced political instability, the recklessness and diminution of the political class and widening financial equality.
It’s not a thriller, then, why English rightwing politicians and the media focus so hectically on “woke” assaults on British heritage and historical past. It’s why such panics about universities altering curriculums or the acute menace to memorials and statues are common options on GB Information and in rightwing newspapers. The best has desecrated the current and so should sanctify the symbols of the previous, depositing in its performative safety all its concern of a brand new nation the place its affect, demographically and ideologically, is waning. And it’s not a thriller why Labour has broadly abdicated the job of channelling the transformation in public attitudes on race, immigration and historical past, selecting as a substitute to concentrate on a “patriotism” that it neither defines nor promotes in any significant approach. It has internalised that confected panic, and continues to be beholden to the view that Britain is conservative at coronary heart and have to be pandered to, not provoked. The result’s declining delight within the nation’s democracy and political accomplishments.
And the result’s an absence of open contest over who we’re: the place a harmful, destabilising minority – egged on by a proper overrepresented in our public discourse and media – runs amok. The rising progressive majority, in the meantime, is advocated for, at nice peril and price, by these people and establishments exterior the political sphere. And as referee is a authorities gone awol that intervenes solely to crack down and mop up when violence spills out on to the streets.
What’s being precipitated just isn’t the much-feared confrontation with the forces of response, however the alienation of latest progressives who don’t recognise the nation they reside in as introduced of their media and politics.
The holdouts are loud, highly effective and properly capitalised, and their assault is allowed to proceed, regardless of all of the indicators that inform us their constituency is getting smaller and smaller within the rearview mirror – and that the nation is leaving them behind.
Supply hyperlink